Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Eccouncil Exam ECSAv10 Topic 2 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's ECSAv10 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 2
[All ECSAv10 Questions]

Jim performed a vulnerability analysis on his network and found no potential problems. He runs another utilitythat executes exploits against his system to verify the results of the vulnerability test. The second utilityexecutes five known exploits against his network in which the vulnerability analysis said were not exploitable.

What kind of results did Jim receive from his vulnerability analysis?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Tyra
2 days ago
False negatives, eh? Guess Jim's network is like a stealth bomber - super stealthy, but still vulnerable to a good old-fashioned rocket launcher. Gotta love those undetected exploits!
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
8 days ago
I believe Jim received false negatives because the exploits were successful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
14 days ago
False negatives, huh? Sounds like Jim's network is more secure than Fort Knox, or maybe he just missed a few landmines. Either way, I wouldn't want to be the one trying to break in!
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
15 days ago
I think Jim might have gotten false positives instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ocie
19 days ago
Ooh, looks like Jim's vulnerability test missed a few exploits! Guess he needs to upgrade his hacking skills to find all the juicy vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
Ty
7 days ago
B) False negatives
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
8 days ago
A) True negatives
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joana
26 days ago
Jim probably received false negatives from his vulnerability analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel