Eccouncil Exam 312-96 Topic 9 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-96 exam

Question #: 31
Topic #: 9

Which of the following method will you use in place of ex.printStackTrace() method to avoid printing stack trace on error?

Aex.StackTrace.getError();

Bex.message();

Cex.getMessage();

Dex.getError();

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Rodolfo at Oct 21, 2024, 09:53 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 312-96 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Belen

4 months ago

C) ex.getMessage(); all the way. Unless of course, the error message is just 'Oops, my bad' - then the stack trace might be more helpful.

upvoted 0 times

Hui

3 months ago

True, it depends on the situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcolm

3 months ago

But sometimes the stack trace can be useful for debugging.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lelia

3 months ago

Same here, it's cleaner and easier to read.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgiann

3 months ago

I always use ex.getMessage() to avoid printing the stack trace.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janna

4 months ago

A) ex.StackTrace.getError(); wait, that's not even a real method! What kind of exam question is this?

upvoted 0 times

...

Mitzie

4 months ago

D) ex.getError(); is the way to go! Stack traces are for noobs, real developers know how to keep things concise.

upvoted 0 times

Clarinda

3 months ago

D) ex.getError(); is indeed the correct method to use, it keeps things clean and simple.

upvoted 0 times

...

Page

3 months ago

A) ex.StackTrace.getError(); is not a valid method either, so it's not the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caprice

3 months ago

B) ex.message(); is not a valid method, so it won't work in this case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wayne

3 months ago

C) ex.getMessage(); is also a good option, it returns the error message without the stack trace.

upvoted 0 times

...

Curtis

5 months ago

B) ex.message(); sounds like it would do the trick. Though I wonder if it's a typo and should be ex.getMessage().

upvoted 0 times

Jamey

4 months ago

Yes, ex.getMessage() is the correct method to avoid printing stack trace.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eleonore

4 months ago

ex.message() is not a valid method, it should be ex.getMessage().

upvoted 0 times

...

Eladia

4 months ago

I think ex.message() should work fine.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janessa

5 months ago

I agree with Lorrine, using ex.getMessage() will avoid printing the stack trace

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrine

5 months ago

I think the answer is C) ex.getMessage()

upvoted 0 times

...

Kirk

5 months ago

C) ex.getMessage(); seems like the obvious choice to me. Who needs a stack trace when you can just get the error message?

upvoted 0 times

Ashley

4 months ago

ex.getMessage() is much more concise and easier to read than ex.printStackTrace().

upvoted 0 times

...

Carisa

4 months ago

I always use ex.getMessage() to get the error message directly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Detra

4 months ago

ex.getMessage() is definitely cleaner than printing the whole stack trace.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ivan

5 months ago

I agree, ex.getMessage() is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...