Eccouncil Exam 312-96 Topic 10 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-96 exam

Question #: 33
Topic #: 10

Which of the following method will you use in place of ex.printStackTrace() method to avoid printing stack trace on error?

Aex.StackTrace.getError();

Bex.message();

Cex.getMessage();

Dex.getError();

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Amie at Dec 08, 2024, 09:10 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 312-96 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Merlyn

1 months ago

Haha, B) ex.message(); sounds like something a newbie would try. C) is the clear winner here.

upvoted 0 times

Corrinne

23 days ago

I agree, B) ex.message(); does sound like a newbie mistake.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharika

1 months ago

D) ex.getError(); sounds like it might work, but C) is the standard way to get the error message.

upvoted 0 times

...

Linette

1 months ago

I agree, C) ex.getMessage(); is the most straightforward option. No need for the noisy stack trace.

upvoted 0 times

Mari

7 days ago

I agree, ex.getMessage(); is much cleaner than printing the whole stack trace.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheridan

7 days ago

Yeah, C) ex.getMessage(); is the way to go. Keeps it clean.

upvoted 0 times

...

Judy

1 months ago

I always use C) ex.getMessage(); to avoid the stack trace.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micah

1 months ago

C) ex.getMessage(); is the way to go. It provides the error message without the stack trace.

upvoted 0 times

Arletta

20 days ago

ex.StackTrace.getError() would just clutter the output with unnecessary information.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carol

21 days ago

I agree, using ex.getMessage() is much cleaner and easier to read.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alex

25 days ago

C) ex.getMessage(); is the way to go. It provides the error message without the stack trace.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laila

2 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think D) ex.getError() might also work

upvoted 0 times

...

Annette

2 months ago

I agree with Mendy, using ex.getMessage() will avoid printing the stack trace

upvoted 0 times

...

Mendy

2 months ago

I think the answer is C) ex.getMessage()

upvoted 0 times

...