Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Eccouncil Exam 312-50 Topic 9 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-50 exam
Question #: 99
Topic #: 9
[All 312-50 Questions]

An audacious attacker is targeting a web server you oversee. He intends to perform a Slow HTTP POST attack, by manipulating 'a' HTTP connection. Each connection sends a byte of data every 'b' second, effectively holding up the connections for an extended period. Your server is designed to manage 'm' connections per second, but any connections exceeding this number tend to overwhelm the system. Given 'a=100' and variable 'm', along with the attacker's intention of maximizing the attack duration 'D=a*b', consider the following scenarios. Which is most likely to result in the longest duration of server unavailability?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

A Slow HTTP POST attack is a type of denial-of-service (DoS) attack that exploits the way web servers handle HTTP requests. The attacker sends a legitimate HTTP POST header to the web server, specifying a large amount of data to be sent in the request body. However, the attacker then sends the data very slowly, keeping the connection open and occupying the server's resources. The attacker can launch multiple such connections, exceeding the server's capacity to handle concurrent requests and preventing legitimate users from accessing the web server.

The attack duration D is given by the formula D = a * b, where a is the number of connections and b is the hold-up time per connection. The attacker intends to maximize D by manipulating a and b. The server can manage m connections per second, but any connections exceeding m will overwhelm the system. Therefore, the scenario that is most likely to result in the longest duration of server unavailability is the one where a > m and b is the largest. Among the four options, this is the case for option B, where a = 100, m = 90, and b = 15. In this scenario, D = 100 * 15 = 1500 seconds, which is the longest among the four options. Option A has a larger b, but a < m, so the server can handle the connections without being overwhelmed. Option C has a > m, but a smaller b, so the attack duration is shorter. Option D has a > m, but a smaller b and a smaller difference between a and m, so the attack duration is also shorter. Reference:

What is a Slow POST Attack & How to Prevent One? (Guide)

Mitigate Slow HTTP GET/POST Vulnerabilities in the Apache HTTP Server - Acunetix

What is a Slow Post DDoS Attack? | NETSCOUT


Contribute your Thoughts:

Alaine
4 days ago
Ah, the joys of web server security! I wonder if the attacker's going to try some 'slow clap' attacks next.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
9 days ago
But what about option A? The server can handle 110 connections per second, so even with the attacker's 100 connections, it should still be operational.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louann
11 days ago
I agree. The server can only handle 90 connections per second, and with each connection held up for 15 seconds, it could cause a significant impact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
18 days ago
This is a classic case of a Slow HTTP POST attack. I'd go with option B as well. The server just can't keep up with the attacker's onslaught, and the 15-second hold-up time is going to be a major problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
1 months ago
I agree with Jodi. Option B seems to be the best choice here. The server's capacity being exceeded, coupled with the lengthy hold-up time, sounds like a recipe for disaster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jodi
1 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I'd say option B is the most likely to cause the longest server unavailability. The attacker's 100 connections exceeding the server's 90 connections per second, combined with the 15-second hold-up time, could really put a strain on the system.
upvoted 0 times
Nan
3 days ago
User3: The 15-second hold-up time per connection in option B could definitely make the server unavailable for a significant duration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adrianna
7 days ago
User2: Yeah, the attacker's 100 connections exceeding the server's 90 connections per second could really strain the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
8 days ago
User 2: Yeah, the attacker's 100 connections exceeding the server's 90 connections per second could really strain the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
11 days ago
User1: I think option B is the most likely to cause the longest server unavailability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
19 days ago
User 1: I think option B is the most likely to cause the longest server unavailability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carrol
1 months ago
I think option B is the most likely to result in the longest duration of server unavailability.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel