Eccouncil Exam 312-49 Topic 1 Question 62 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-49 exam

Question #: 62
Topic #: 1

Jacob, a cybercrime investigator, joined a forensics team to participate in a criminal case involving digital evidence. After the investigator collected all the evidence and presents it to the court, the judge dropped the case and the defense attorney pressed charges against Jacob and the rest of the forensics team for unlawful search and seizure. What forensics privacy issue was not addressed prior to collecting the evidence?

ACompliance with the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

BCompliance with the Third Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

CNone of these

DCompliance with the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Karan at Jul 15, 2024, 03:52 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 312-49 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Dorthy

9 days ago

Haha, the defense attorney must have been a real Sherlock Holmes to catch the forensics team on a Fourth Amendment violation. Maybe they should have hired a private eye to do the dirty work instead of trying to do it themselves.

upvoted 0 times

...

1 months ago

D? Clearly the answer is D. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable search and seizure. Looks like the forensics team forgot to get a warrant before collecting the evidence. Rookie mistake.

upvoted 0 times

Dannette

5 days ago

Yeah, they definitely should have gotten a warrant before collecting the evidence. That's a big oversight.

upvoted 0 times

...

James

25 days ago

You're right, the Fourth Amendment is all about protecting against unreasonable search and seizure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Susana

1 months ago

Wait, the Fourth Amendment? Seriously? I thought this was a cybercrime case, not a history lesson. Next time, the forensics team should have a lawyer on speed dial, not a history book.

upvoted 0 times

Olen

19 days ago

I agree, it's important to understand the legal implications when dealing with digital evidence.

upvoted 0 times

...

Albert

21 days ago

Yeah, they should have definitely consulted a lawyer before collecting the evidence.

upvoted 0 times

...