Eccouncil Exam 312-49 Topic 1 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-49 exam

Question #: 60
Topic #: 1

Jacob, a cybercrime investigator, joined a forensics team to participate in a criminal case involving digital evidence. After the investigator collected all the evidence and presents it to the court, the judge dropped the case and the defense attorney pressed charges against Jacob and the rest of the forensics team for unlawful search and seizure. What forensics privacy issue was not addressed prior to collecting the evidence?

ACompliance with the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

BCompliance with the Third Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

CNone of these

DCompliance with the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Iluminada at Jun 30, 2024, 09:29 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 312-49 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Willard

5 months ago

Haha, the defense attorney really pulled a fast one on Jacob, didn't they? Looks like they need to work on their 'Fourth Amendment-fu' before the next case.

upvoted 0 times

Francine

3 months ago

The defense attorney was quick to capitalize on that mistake.

upvoted 0 times

...

Remedios

3 months ago

I can't believe they missed that crucial privacy issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawn

3 months ago

Yeah, they definitely overlooked the Fourth Amendment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kaitlyn

3 months ago

They should have known better, especially in a case like this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

4 months ago

They should have been more careful with the search and seizure process.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlie

4 months ago

I can't believe they missed such a crucial privacy issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dong

4 months ago

Yeah, they definitely overlooked the Fourth Amendment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cory

4 months ago

Yeah, they definitely dropped the ball on that one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Graham

5 months ago

Clearly D is the answer. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable search and seizure. Jacob and the team should have gotten a warrant before collecting that evidence. Rookie mistake!

upvoted 0 times

Gearldine

4 months ago

Yeah, they definitely messed up by not getting a warrant first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hui

5 months ago

I agree, they should have followed proper procedures.

upvoted 0 times

...

Virgina

6 months ago

Yeah, they should have obtained a warrant before collecting the evidence.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elke

6 months ago

Whoa, the Fourth Amendment, of course! You gotta have that warrant, my dude. Jacob shoulda brushed up on his constitutional law before seizing all that evidence.

upvoted 0 times