BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Eccouncil Exam 312-38 Topic 3 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-38 exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 3
[All 312-38 Questions]

Ryan, a network security engineer, after a recent attack, is trying to get information about the kind

of attack his users were facing. He has decided to put into production one honeypot called Kojoney. He

is interested in emulating the network vulnerability, rather than the real vulnerability system, making

this probe safer and more flexible. Which type of honeypot is he trying to implement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Ryan is implementing a low interaction honeypot with Kojoney. Low interaction honeypots are designed to emulate services and applications to a certain degree without exposing the real underlying system. They provide a safe environment that can be used to study the attacker's behavior and methods without the risk of compromising the actual system.Kojoney, specifically, is a low interaction honeypot that emulates an SSH server1. It uses minimal resources and is less complex compared to high interaction honeypots, making it easier to deploy and manage. By simulating network vulnerabilities rather than actual system vulnerabilities, Kojoney can attract attackers and record their interaction, which helps in understanding the attack patterns and potentially identifying the attackers.


by Ashton at Sep 16, 2024, 03:59 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 312-38 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Chana
16 days ago
Hah, this one's a no-brainer! C is the answer, hands down. Gotta love a good ol' low interaction honeypot to keep the bad guys at bay.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
18 days ago
Low interaction honeypots, huh? That's a pretty clever way to handle things. Gotta stay one step ahead of those pesky hackers, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Dalene
1 days ago
Definitely, it's all about staying ahead of the game when it comes to network security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
3 days ago
Yes, low interaction honeypots are a great way to gather information without risking too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Corinne
21 days ago
C definitely seems like the answer here. Emulating vulnerabilities without exposing the real system? Clever move, Ryan!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
22 days ago
Ooh, this one's tricky! But I reckon C is the way to go. Gotta keep those hackers on their toes, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Gregoria
7 days ago
Yeah, I agree. It's important to keep the hackers guessing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
13 days ago
I think C is the best choice. Low interaction honeypots are safer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thad
1 months ago
Hmm, I think C is the correct answer. Low interaction honeypots are designed to emulate services and vulnerabilities, making it a safer and more flexible option.
upvoted 0 times
Stevie
4 days ago
I agree, C is the correct answer. Low interaction honeypots are less risky to deploy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Floyd
1 months ago
I think Ryan should go for a research honeypot to gather more information about the attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
1 months ago
I believe he is going for a low interaction honeypot to emulate the network vulnerability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Therese
2 months ago
I think Ryan is trying to implement a high interaction honeypot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
2 months ago
Haha, I bet Ryan's users are going to have a real 'honey' of a time dealing with this attack! C is the correct answer, for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
2 months ago
Definitely C. Low interaction honeypots are designed to emulate services and vulnerabilities, which is exactly what Kojoney is doing in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) Low interaction honeypots. Kojoney is a low-interaction honeypot, which means it emulates the network vulnerability rather than the real system, making it safer and more flexible.
upvoted 0 times
Kayleigh
11 days ago
Yes, honeypots can vary in their level of interaction and purpose.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
12 days ago
That's interesting. I didn't know there were different types of honeypots.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winifred
19 days ago
Yes, you are correct. Kojoney is indeed a low-interaction honeypot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
1 months ago
I think the answer is C) Low interaction honeypots.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel