BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Eccouncil Exam 212-89 Topic 5 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 212-89 exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 5
[All 212-89 Questions]

Which of the following methods help incident responders to reduce the false-positive

alert rates and further provide benefits of focusing on topmost priority issues reducing

potential risk and corporate liabilities?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Threat correlation is a method used by incident responders to analyze and associate various indicators of compromise (IoCs) and alerts to identify genuine threats. By correlating data from multiple sources and applying intelligence to distinguish between unrelated events and coordinated attack patterns, responders can significantly reduce the rate of false-positive alerts. This enables teams to prioritize their efforts on the most critical and likely threats, thereby reducing potential risks and corporate liabilities. Effective threat correlation involves the use of sophisticated security information and event management (SIEM) systems, threat intelligence platforms, and analytical techniques to identify relationships between seemingly disparate security events and alerts.


by Lavonna at Sep 13, 2024, 07:11 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 212-89 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Isabella
1 months ago
Wait, so we're supposed to choose the method that reduces false positives and prioritizes risks? Sounds like a job for a professional, not a bunch of security newbies like us!
upvoted 0 times
...
Una
1 months ago
Hah, threat attribution? More like threat attribution headache! Give me some good old-fashioned threat correlation any day.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
1 months ago
I agree, B is the way to go. It's like putting the threat in perspective, you know? Helps us prioritize and focus on what really matters.
upvoted 0 times
Barrie
3 days ago
User 1: I think B) Threat contextualization is the best method.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nikita
1 months ago
Threat contextualization all the way! It helps us understand the relevance and impact of the threat, not just the threat itself.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
1 months ago
Haha, sorting through security alerts is like finding a needle in a haystack. Threat correlation is the way to go, it's like putting the pieces together to get the full picture.
upvoted 0 times
Trina
12 hours ago
I agree, it helps connect the dots and prioritize the most critical threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
2 days ago
Threat correlation is definitely key in reducing false positives and focusing on top priority issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
3 days ago
D) Threat attribution
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
4 days ago
C) Threat correlation
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
10 days ago
B) Threat contextualization
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
12 days ago
A) Threat profiling
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wai
1 months ago
I agree, threat contextualization is key. It's like sorting through the haystack to find the needles that really matter. Efficient and effective!
upvoted 0 times
Edwin
9 days ago
C) Threat correlation can help incident responders connect the dots between different security events and identify larger threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
13 days ago
B) Threat contextualization is definitely important for understanding the relevance of threats to the organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
13 days ago
A) Threat profiling can also help incident responders by identifying patterns and trends in threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joni
2 months ago
Threat contextualization seems like the way to go here. This helps provide more context around the alerts, reducing the noise and allowing us to focus on the real threats.
upvoted 0 times
France
22 days ago
Daniela: True, threat attribution can also help us understand the source of the threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
26 days ago
Threat correlation is important for connecting the dots between different alerts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniela
29 days ago
Threat profiling could also be useful in prioritizing the most critical issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
1 months ago
I agree, threat contextualization can definitely help us reduce false positives.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashaunda
2 months ago
I agree with Toshia, threat profiling can prioritize topmost issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
2 months ago
I believe threat correlation is also important to reduce potential risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toshia
2 months ago
I think threat profiling can help reduce false positives.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel