Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Eccouncil Exam 212-89 Topic 3 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 212-89 exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 3
[All 212-89 Questions]

Which of the following methods help incident responders to reduce the false-positive

alert rates and further provide benefits of focusing on topmost priority issues reducing

potential risk and corporate liabilities?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Threat correlation is a method used by incident responders to analyze and associate various indicators of compromise (IoCs) and alerts to identify genuine threats. By correlating data from multiple sources and applying intelligence to distinguish between unrelated events and coordinated attack patterns, responders can significantly reduce the rate of false-positive alerts. This enables teams to prioritize their efforts on the most critical and likely threats, thereby reducing potential risks and corporate liabilities. Effective threat correlation involves the use of sophisticated security information and event management (SIEM) systems, threat intelligence platforms, and analytical techniques to identify relationships between seemingly disparate security events and alerts.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Jaime
9 days ago
Threat profiling, huh? Sounds like we're playing detective. I'm already picturing the whiteboard with all the red strings and sticky notes. Let's get to the bottom of this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
14 days ago
Honestly, I'm just hoping the answer isn't 'Threat attribution' - that sounds like a headache and a half! Give me something that actually makes my job easier, not harder.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
18 days ago
Ooh, threat contextualization sounds like a great option. Understanding the context behind those alerts can give us a better sense of what's truly important.
upvoted 0 times
Lezlie
5 days ago
User 2: Definitely, understanding the context behind the alerts is key to reducing false positives and focusing on what matters most.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
10 days ago
User 1: I agree, threat contextualization can really help us prioritize the most critical issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vi
23 days ago
I believe threat correlation is also important in reducing false positives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
25 days ago
I agree, threat profiling helps prioritize the most critical issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kara
28 days ago
I think threat profiling can help reduce false positives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
1 months ago
Threat correlation is the way to go! It helps us identify patterns and connect the dots, reducing false positives and keeping our focus on the real issues.
upvoted 0 times
Mozell
3 days ago
C) Threat correlation
upvoted 0 times
...
Shala
13 days ago
B) Threat contextualization
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
21 days ago
A) Threat profiling
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel