Dell EMC Exam E20-260 Topic 4 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Dell EMC's E20-260 exam

Question #: 84
Topic #: 4

Refer to the exhibit.

During a short power disruption to cluster 2, director-2-1-A failed. Power was restored after 5 minutes. In examining the output of the vault status command, you note that cluster-2's status reads "Cluster is not vaulting/unvaulting".

Why did this message appear?

AThe power disruption affected a single director only.

BThere was no power disruption at cluster-1

CThe power disruption did not affect all 'A' directors.

DThe vaulting process runs on cluster-1

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Keneth at Apr 13, 2024, 03:11 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium E20-260 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Ming

9 months ago

But could it be A since only one director failed during the power disruption?

upvoted 0 times

...

Whitney

9 months ago

I agree with User1, it must be C because not all 'A' directors were affected.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trevor

9 months ago

I disagree, I believe it's D.

upvoted 0 times

...

Candida

9 months ago

I agree with Tiara. The message likely appeared because of the single director failure. Option A seems like the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gayla

9 months ago

I think the answer is C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tiara

10 months ago

I don't think so. If the power disruption only affected one director, it makes more sense that it's related to that. So I still lean towards option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louisa

10 months ago

But what about option D? Could the vaulting process running on cluster-1 have caused the message?

upvoted 0 times

...

Arthur

10 months ago

That makes sense. So option A could be the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tiara

10 months ago

I think the message appeared because the power disruption only affected a single director.

upvoted 0 times

...

Juan

11 months ago

I think C is the right answer. The question says the power disruption didn't affect all 'A' directors, so the vaulting process would be impacted even though it's running on a different cluster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helene

11 months ago

Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm curious why the vaulting process would be impacted at all if it's running on a different cluster. D seems like it could be the answer, but I'm not totally confident.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristel

11 months ago

I'm not so sure. If the power disruption only affected a single director, wouldn't the vaulting process just fail over to the other director in the cluster? I'm not convinced A is the right answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bronwyn

11 months ago

I'm leaning towards A. The power disruption only affected a single director, so the vaulting process should still be able to run on the other directors in the cluster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carole

11 months ago

I think the answer is probably B. The question says the power disruption only affected cluster 2, so it shouldn't have impacted the vaulting process running on cluster 1.

upvoted 0 times

Reita

9 months ago

It could be C though. The disruption might not have affected all 'A' directors.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nickolas

9 months ago

I think the answer is probably B.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aleshia

11 months ago

This question seems pretty straightforward, but I'm not sure about the answer. The power disruption only affected cluster 2, so I'm not sure why the vaulting process would be impacted.

upvoted 0 times

...