Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Dell EMC Exam D-VXB-DY-A-24 Topic 4 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for Dell EMC's D-VXB-DY-A-24 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 4
[All D-VXB-DY-A-24 Questions]

A customer has an existing ACI fabric. Their management has decided to invest in NSX for virtual networking but also retain ACI for their customers and for physical networking.

What is a consideration?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Integrating NSX for virtual networking while retaining ACI for physical networking is possible, but it may be cost prohibitive. This approach requires careful planning and management of both virtual and physical network environments, potentially leading to higher operational costs and complexity.


Technical resources on integrating VMware NSX with Cisco ACI.

Cost considerations and best practices for hybrid network environments.

Contribute your Thoughts:

Sena
3 months ago
I'm going with option D. Integrating ACI and NSX is probably doable, but the cost is gonna be through the roof.
upvoted 0 times
Trinidad
3 months ago
I agree, the cost might be too high for the customer to justify the integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
3 months ago
Option D is definitely a concern. The cost of integrating ACI and NSX could be a major factor.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Laila
3 months ago
Haha, this is like trying to have both a Ferrari and a Lamborghini in your garage. Seems a bit excessive, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
Erinn
3 months ago
C) This solution is possible. The ACI APIC can be deployed as a virtual machine in virtual mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
3 months ago
B) The customer will need to provide traditional tree network environment for NSX because only ACI works with the spine and leaf model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
3 months ago
A) This solution is not possible. ACI takes care of virtual and physical networking.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hassie
4 months ago
Option C seems like the best choice here. Deploying the APIC as a VM would allow them to keep using ACI for the virtual stuff.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
4 months ago
I think option D is worth considering as well. Cost could be a factor in this decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lon
4 months ago
I think the cusLoner needs to stick with ACI. Trying to use both ACI and NSX sounds like it could get really complicated and expensive.
upvoted 0 times
Judy
3 months ago
A) This solution is not possible. ACI takes care of virtual and physical networking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blossom
3 months ago
I) It's important to consider the cost implications before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
3 months ago
D) This solution is possible but may be cost prohibitive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
3 months ago
C) This solution is possible. The ACI APIC can be deployed as a virtual machine in virtual mode.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Susy
4 months ago
This isn't possible. ACI is designed for both virtual and physical networking, so NSX would just be redundant.
upvoted 0 times
Bethanie
3 months ago
B) The customer will need to provide traditional tree network environment for NSX because only ACI works with the spine and leaf model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
3 months ago
A) This solution is not possible. ACI takes care of virtual and physical networking.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Angella
4 months ago
But ACI works with the spine and leaf model, so maybe a combination of both options B and C could work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more practical. NSX requires a traditional tree network environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
4 months ago
I think option C is the best choice. ACI APIC can be deployed as a virtual machine in virtual mode.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel