Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Dell EMC Exam D-RP-OE-A-24 Topic 2 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for Dell EMC's D-RP-OE-A-24 exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 2
[All D-RP-OE-A-24 Questions]

A storage administrator has one production site and one remote site. The administrator configured the RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) cluster at both sites. The current environment

has two Consistency Groups configured with two copies each; one production copy and one remote copy. Based on the company's growing business requirements, the

administrator has been asked to keep a local copy of the production data.

Which action should occur in order to meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

To meet the requirement of keeping a local copy of the production data in a RecoverPoint environment with VNX(SE) clusters, the administrator can add a local copy into the existing Consistency Group. This action does not require deleting and reconfiguring the existing Consistency Group or upgrading the license. Here are the steps:

Access Unisphere for RecoverPoint: Log into the Unisphere interface for RecoverPoint management.

Navigate to the Consistency Group: Find the Consistency Group that needs the local copy.

Add a Local Copy: Use the option to add a copy into the selected Consistency Group.

Configure the Local Copy: Specify the settings for the local copy, such as the Journal volume and RPO settings.

Apply Changes: Save the changes to implement the local replication.

This process allows the administrator to enhance the data protection strategy by adding a local copy for operational recovery or other business needs without disrupting the existing remote replication setup1.


by Glory at Aug 27, 2024, 06:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium D-RP-OE-A-24 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Shoshana
2 months ago
Personally, I'd go with Option C. Adding a copy sounds like the easiest and most straightforward solution. Plus, who doesn't love a little light data replication? It's like storage admin speed dating!
upvoted 0 times
Keena
1 months ago
It's like a storage admin speed dating, just adding a little local data replication!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
2 months ago
Definitely, adding a copy for local replication would be the most efficient way to meet the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
2 months ago
I agree, it would be much easier than deleting and reconfiguring the Consistency Group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
2 months ago
Option C sounds like the best choice. Adding a local copy seems like the simplest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Staci
2 months ago
Option A really throws me off. I mean, if RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) can't handle more than two copies, why are they even asking this question? Talk about a head-scratcher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
3 months ago
Ah, the old 'delete and reconfigure' solution. Classic! But hey, if it works, it works, right? Gotta love the 'if it ain't broke, break it' approach.
upvoted 0 times
Shawnna
2 months ago
C: I guess it's the best way to ensure everything is set up correctly for the new requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
2 months ago
B: Totally, it's like hitting the reset button and starting over.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
2 months ago
A: Yeah, sometimes you just gotta start fresh with a clean slate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Izetta
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. What if the existing setup can't handle the extra copy? Might be better to look into upgrading the license, just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
Dean
2 months ago
That sounds like a safer option. It's better to upgrade the license to ensure everything runs smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
2 months ago
Maybe we should consider upgrading the RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) license to RecoverPoint/EX and then reconfigure the Consistency Group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
2 months ago
That could work, but what if the existing setup can't handle the extra copy?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
3 months ago
I think we should add a copy into the existing Consistency Group for a local replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pete
3 months ago
I agree with Nichelle, adding a copy for local replication seems like a more practical solution for now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
3 months ago
That could be an option too, but I believe adding a copy for local replication might be a quicker solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
3 months ago
Option C seems like the obvious choice here. Why delete and reconfigure when you can just add another copy? Keeps things simple, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Talia
2 months ago
I agree, it's much simpler than deleting and reconfiguring the Consistency Group. Option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
2 months ago
Option C is definitely the way to go. Adding a copy for local replication is the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Silva
3 months ago
But wouldn't it be better to upgrade the license to RecoverPoint/EX and then reconfigure the Consistency Group?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
3 months ago
I think we should add a copy into the existing Consistency Group for a local replication.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel