Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Dell EMC Exam D-RP-OE-A-24 Topic 1 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Dell EMC's Dell RecoverPoint Operate Achievement exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 1
[All Dell RecoverPoint Operate Achievement Questions]

A storage administrator has one production site and one remote site. The administrator configured the RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) cluster at both sites. The current environment

has two Consistency Groups configured with two copies each; one production copy and one remote copy. Based on the company's growing business requirements, the

administrator has been asked to keep a local copy of the production data.

Which action should occur in order to meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

To meet the requirement of keeping a local copy of the production data in a RecoverPoint environment with VNX(SE) clusters, the administrator can add a local copy into the existing Consistency Group. This action does not require deleting and reconfiguring the existing Consistency Group or upgrading the license. Here are the steps:

Access Unisphere for RecoverPoint: Log into the Unisphere interface for RecoverPoint management.

Navigate to the Consistency Group: Find the Consistency Group that needs the local copy.

Add a Local Copy: Use the option to add a copy into the selected Consistency Group.

Configure the Local Copy: Specify the settings for the local copy, such as the Journal volume and RPO settings.

Apply Changes: Save the changes to implement the local replication.

This process allows the administrator to enhance the data protection strategy by adding a local copy for operational recovery or other business needs without disrupting the existing remote replication setup1.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Louis
3 days ago
I don't think option A is correct. RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) should support more than two copies in a Consistency Group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
4 days ago
Option C makes the most sense to me. Adding a local copy to the existing Consistency Group is the simplest solution to meet the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
6 days ago
B? Delete and reconfigure? What is this, the Stone Age? We're in the 21st century, people. C is clearly the way to go. Unless, of course, you want to spend the next month configuring everything from scratch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbye
13 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about A. 'RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) does not support more than two copies'? That sounds like a load of hogwash to me. I'd put my money on C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
13 days ago
That could be a good option too, but it might be more costly. Adding a copy for local replication seems like a more cost-effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
16 days ago
D seems a bit overkill. Upgrading the license just to add a local copy? That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. I'd go with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magdalene
17 days ago
But wouldn't it be better to upgrade the RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) license to RecoverPoint/EX and then reconfigure the Consistency Group?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
27 days ago
Option C looks good to me. Why would we need to delete and reconfigure everything when we can just add a local copy to the existing Consistency Group? Seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
Brigette
4 days ago
Adding a local copy to the existing Consistency Group definitely seems like the logical choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eloisa
6 days ago
It makes sense to avoid unnecessary reconfiguration if we can achieve the same result by simply adding a copy to the existing setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
7 days ago
I agree, adding a local copy to the existing Consistency Group would be the most efficient way to meet the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
8 days ago
Option C looks good to me. Why would we need to delete and reconfigure everything when we can just add a local copy to the existing Consistency Group? Seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mila
29 days ago
I think we should add a copy into the existing Consistency Group for a local replication.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel