Dell EMC Exam D-RP-OE-A-24 Topic 1 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Dell EMC's D-RP-OE-A-24 exam

Question #: 15
Topic #: 1

A storage administrator has one production site and one remote site. The administrator configured the RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) cluster at both sites. The current environment

has two Consistency Groups configured with two copies each; one production copy and one remote copy. Based on the company's growing business requirements, the

administrator has been asked to keep a local copy of the production data.

Which action should occur in order to meet this requirement?

ARecoverPoint with VNX(SE) does not support more than two copies in a single Consistency Group

BDelete and reconfigure the existing Consistency Group for a local and remote replication

CAdd a copy into the existing Consistency Group for a local replication

DUpgrade the RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) license to RecoverPoint/EX and then reconfigure the Consistency Group

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

To meet the requirement of keeping a local copy of the production data in a RecoverPoint environment with VNX(SE) clusters, the administrator can add a local copy into the existing Consistency Group. This action does not require deleting and reconfiguring the existing Consistency Group or upgrading the license. Here are the steps:

Access Unisphere for RecoverPoint: Log into the Unisphere interface for RecoverPoint management.

Navigate to the Consistency Group: Find the Consistency Group that needs the local copy.

Add a Local Copy: Use the option to add a copy into the selected Consistency Group.

Configure the Local Copy: Specify the settings for the local copy, such as the Journal volume and RPO settings.

Apply Changes: Save the changes to implement the local replication.

This process allows the administrator to enhance the data protection strategy by adding a local copy for operational recovery or other business needs without disrupting the existing remote replication setup1.

by Elise at Sep 13, 2024, 11:26 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium D-RP-OE-A-24 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Therese

1 months ago

I bet the storage admin is regrowing their hair after being asked to meet this requirement. Time to break out the Rogaine!

upvoted 0 times

Raymon

7 days ago

D: Upgrading the license seems like a good solution for meeting the growing business requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Catalina

18 days ago

C: D) Upgrade the RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) license to RecoverPoint/EX and then reconfigure the Consistency Group

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawn

26 days ago

B: That sounds like the best option to keep a local copy of the production data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dino

28 days ago

A: C) Add a copy into the existing Consistency Group for a local replication

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrine

2 months ago

Option C is the way to go. I don't want to be the one who has to explain to the boss why we spent money on an upgrade when a simple addition would do the trick.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vincent

2 months ago

I'm going with C. Why delete and reconfigure when you can just add a local copy to the existing Consistency Group? Efficient and cost-effective.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

2 months ago

D seems like overkill. Why upgrade the license when you can just add a local copy to the existing setup? Upgrade should be the last resort.

upvoted 0 times

Willodean

1 months ago

D) Upgrade the RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) license to RecoverPoint/EX and then reconfigure the Consistency Group

upvoted 0 times

...

Basilia

1 months ago

B) Delete and reconfigure the existing Consistency Group for a local and remote replication

upvoted 0 times

...

Jarod

1 months ago

C) Add a copy into the existing Consistency Group for a local replication

upvoted 0 times

...

Louis

2 months ago

I don't think option A is correct. RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) should support more than two copies in a Consistency Group.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tasia

2 months ago

Option C makes the most sense to me. Adding a local copy to the existing Consistency Group is the simplest solution to meet the requirement.

upvoted 0 times

Karon

1 months ago

That sounds like the best course of action to take in this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharita

1 months ago

I agree, it seems like the most straightforward way to ensure there's a local copy of the production data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wade

1 months ago

Option C makes the most sense to me. Adding a local copy to the existing Consistency Group is the simplest solution to meet the requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chantell

2 months ago

B? Delete and reconfigure? What is this, the Stone Age? We're in the 21st century, people. C is clearly the way to go. Unless, of course, you want to spend the next month configuring everything from scratch.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bobbye

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about A. 'RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) does not support more than two copies'? That sounds like a load of hogwash to me. I'd put my money on C.

upvoted 0 times

Shad

1 months ago

Let's go with C then. It seems like the most practical solution for keeping a local copy of the production data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ona

1 months ago

I agree, C seems like the best option. Adding a copy for local replication makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Coral

2 months ago

I think A is incorrect. RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) should support more than two copies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mila

2 months ago

That could be a good option too, but it might be more costly. Adding a copy for local replication seems like a more cost-effective solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marvel

2 months ago

D seems a bit overkill. Upgrading the license just to add a local copy? That's like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. I'd go with C.

upvoted 0 times

Mose

26 days ago

Teddy: Let's go with C then, it seems like the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lenita

1 months ago

User 3: Adding a copy for local replication sounds like the most efficient solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Teddy

1 months ago

Yeah, I think C makes more sense. Just add a copy for local replication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Candida

2 months ago

I agree, D does seem like too much for just adding a local copy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Magdalene

2 months ago

But wouldn't it be better to upgrade the RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) license to RecoverPoint/EX and then reconfigure the Consistency Group?

upvoted 0 times

...

Marti

3 months ago

Option C looks good to me. Why would we need to delete and reconfigure everything when we can just add a local copy to the existing Consistency Group? Seems like the most straightforward solution.

upvoted 0 times

Brigette

2 months ago

Adding a local copy to the existing Consistency Group definitely seems like the logical choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eloisa

2 months ago

It makes sense to avoid unnecessary reconfiguration if we can achieve the same result by simply adding a copy to the existing setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Doretha

2 months ago

I agree, adding a local copy to the existing Consistency Group would be the most efficient way to meet the requirement.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lemuel

2 months ago

Option C looks good to me. Why would we need to delete and reconfigure everything when we can just add a local copy to the existing Consistency Group? Seems like the most straightforward solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mila

3 months ago

I think we should add a copy into the existing Consistency Group for a local replication.

upvoted 0 times

...