Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Dell EMC Exam D-RP-DY-A-24 Topic 4 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for Dell EMC's D-RP-DY-A-24 exam

Question #: 17
Topic #: 4

[All D-RP-DY-A-24 Questions]

A storage administrator wants to implement a new RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) cluster using virtual RPAs in their VMware environment. The administrator wants to ensure

the highest availability for all communication within the cluster.

What is the recommended number of virtual switches required for this type of configuration?

A2

B1

C3

D4

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

For ensuring the highest availability for all communication within a RecoverPoint with VNX(SE) cluster using virtual RPAs in a VMware environment, it is recommended to use at least 2 virtual switches. This setup allows for redundancy and load balancing, which are crucial for maintaining high availability and preventing single points of failure.

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines 6.0.1 vSphere HTML5 Plugin Administrator's Guide, Chapter on network configuration and best practices for virtual RPAs.

by Rosita at Nov 19, 2024, 01:23 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium D-RP-DY-A-24 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Gracie

2 months ago

I'd say C) 3 is the way to go. Any less and it's like playing Russian Roulette with your data. Any more and you're just showing off, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Iraida

2 months ago

2 switches? Are you kidding me? This is a mission-critical RecoverPoint cluster, not a lemonade stand! Definitely gotta go with the 4 switches.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fausto

3 months ago

I'm going with D) 4. Gotta be safe and redundant, you know? Can't have any single points of failure in a high-availability setup like this.

upvoted 0 times

Virgilio

2 months ago

I think 2 virtual switches would be enough for this setup, but it's always better to be safe than sorry.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jenise

2 months ago

User 4: 4 it is then, better safe than sorry.

upvoted 0 times

...

Broderick

2 months ago

User 3: Definitely, can't afford any single points of failure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quentin

2 months ago

User 2: Agreed, redundancy is key in a high-availability setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melissia

2 months ago

I agree, having 4 virtual switches definitely adds an extra layer of redundancy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daren

2 months ago

User 1: I think 4 virtual switches is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Kerry

3 months ago

Hmm, that makes sense. More virtual switches can provide better redundancy and fault tolerance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lea

3 months ago

Hmm, I'm not so sure. Shouldn't we need 4 virtual switches to ensure the highest availability? One for each type of traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kandis

3 months ago

I think the answer is C) 3. You need separate switches for management, replication, and failover, right?

upvoted 0 times

Yvonne

2 months ago

I agree with the first user. Having separate switches for management, replication, and failover is crucial for optimal performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roslyn

2 months ago

I believe the answer is A) 2. Having two virtual switches can also provide redundancy and high availability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

3 months ago

Yes, you are correct. Separate switches for different functions ensure better availability.

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Leota

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe it's 3 virtual switches for the highest availability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kerry

4 months ago

I think the recommended number of virtual switches is 2.

upvoted 0 times

...