BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Dell EMC Exam D-NWG-FN-23 Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Dell EMC's D-NWG-FN-23 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 1
[All D-NWG-FN-23 Questions]

You have been asked to examine a BGP configuration for a co-worker who is having difficulty establishing BGP peering. The address shown is that of the neighbor's Lo0 interface. Given the configuration shown, what would be your recommendation?

S3(config-router-bgp-65042)# neighbor 192.168.32.1

S3(config-router-neighbor)# remote-as 65042

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Artie
4 months ago
Seriously, who comes up with these BGP questions? They're like a secret language only network admins can understand. I'd go with C just to get it over with.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirby
4 months ago
I've seen this problem before. The correct answer is B, no doubt about it. That update-source command is like the duct tape of BGP configuration, always fixes the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
4 months ago
Haha, I remember dealing with this kind of BGP issue. The answer is definitely B. Adding that update-source command is crucial for establishing a stable BGP session.
upvoted 0 times
Darrin
4 months ago
Yes, it's a common step to ensure BGP peering stability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
4 months ago
I agree, adding the update-source command is important for BGP peering.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vallie
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. The configuration seems to be using the neighbor's loopback interface already, so I'm not sure if that's the issue. Maybe C is the right answer? Checking the BGP state could help identify the problem.
upvoted 0 times
Vinnie
4 months ago
I agree, let's try option C and see if that helps.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
4 months ago
I think C is a good option. Checking the BGP state is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erick
5 months ago
Adding the update-source command can help establish the BGP peering using the loopback interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iesha
5 months ago
Why do you think option B is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
5 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the correct solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
5 months ago
I think the correct answer is B. Adding the update-source loopback 0 command will ensure that the BGP session uses the loopback interface, which is generally more reliable than using a physical interface.
upvoted 0 times
Ines
4 months ago
Yes, it can help with stability and prevent issues with physical interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
5 months ago
I agree, using the loopback interface is a good idea for BGP peering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
5 months ago
A) Modify the existing configuration to be: S3(config-router-bgp-65042)# neighbor 192.168.32.1/24 S3(config-router-neighbor)# peer-as 65042
upvoted 0 times
...
Eileen
5 months ago
C) Issue the no shutdown command and verify that the BGP state is ESTABLISHED
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolf
5 months ago
Yes, it can help with stability and prevent issues with physical interface changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
5 months ago
I agree, using the loopback interface is a good idea for BGP peering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
5 months ago
B) Add the following to the existing configuration: S3(config-router-neighbor)# update-source loopback 0 S3(config-router-neighbor)# no shutdown
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Iesha
5 months ago
I think option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel