Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CyberArk Exam SECRET-SEN Topic 5 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's SECRET-SEN exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 5
[All SECRET-SEN Questions]

During the configuration of Conjur, what is a possible deployment scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Garry
28 days ago
Option B seems logical, but I can't help but wonder if the Conjur developers had a coin flip to decide where to put the Leader cluster. Truly a mystery for the ages!
upvoted 0 times
Armanda
2 days ago
Maybe the developers had a good reason for choosing that configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jestine
5 days ago
I think option B makes sense, it allows for flexibility in deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlean
1 months ago
I'm going with option A. Keeping the Standbys in Kubernetes is a smart move, just in case someone forgets to water the Leader and Followers.
upvoted 0 times
Samira
11 days ago
User 2: Yeah, having Standbys in Kubernetes is a good backup plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
17 days ago
User 1: I think option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dierdre
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option C looks like it might be the most flexible, allowing for different deployment scenarios. Gotta love that versatility!
upvoted 0 times
Cyril
4 days ago
I think Option C is the most flexible too. It gives you more deployment options.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nu
1 months ago
I believe option C is also valid, as Followers and Standbys can run inside or outside the environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
2 months ago
I agree with Shenika, because the Conjur Leader cluster can be deployed outside of a Kubernetes environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
2 months ago
Option D sounds good to me. Having the entire Conjur setup inside Kubernetes seems like the most straightforward and integrated approach.
upvoted 0 times
Cassie
1 months ago
I agree, having everything inside Kubernetes can simplify management and deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
1 months ago
Option D sounds good to me. Having the entire Conjur setup inside Kubernetes seems like the most straightforward and integrated approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shenika
2 months ago
I think the possible deployment scenario is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgeanna
2 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. It makes sense to have the Conjur Leader cluster outside the Kubernetes environment, while the Followers can be deployed either way.
upvoted 0 times
Malika
1 months ago
I prefer option A, keeping the Leader and Followers outside of Kubernetes for simplicity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
1 months ago
I think option C could also work, with the Leader outside and Followers and Standbys flexible in their deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
1 months ago
I agree, having the Leader cluster outside of Kubernetes makes sense for better control.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel