BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CyberArk Exam SECRET-SEN Topic 1 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's SECRET-SEN exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 1
[All SECRET-SEN Questions]

During the configuration of Conjur, what is a possible deployment scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Gracia at Sep 11, 2024, 10:55 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SECRET-SEN Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Bev
1 months ago
D seems the most comprehensive solution, with the entire Conjur setup running inside the Kubernetes environment. This should provide the best security and scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
1 months ago
I don't know about you guys, but I'm just hoping the exam doesn't ask us to 'Conjur' up the right answer. That would be a real 'magic' trick!
upvoted 0 times
...
Zoila
1 months ago
I think option B is correct because it allows Followers to run inside or outside the Kubernetes environment, providing more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
1 months ago
Why do you think option B is the correct one?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
1 months ago
I'm going with C. It makes sense to have the Leader cluster outside the Kubernetes environment, while the Followers and Standbys can be deployed flexibly.
upvoted 0 times
Celeste
3 days ago
Definitely, it's important to consider the best deployment scenario for Conjur.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
4 days ago
I agree, having the Leader cluster separate gives more control over the environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
20 days ago
It's important to have that flexibility with where the Followers and Standbys can run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
22 days ago
That sounds like a good choice. It allows for flexibility in deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
22 days ago
I think C is the best option too, it allows for a versatile deployment setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Basilia
23 days ago
I agree, having the Leader cluster outside the Kubernetes environment gives more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
28 days ago
C) The Leader cluster is deployed outside a Kubernetes environment; Followers and Standbys can run inside or outside the environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zoila
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the correct deployment scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
2 months ago
I think the possible deployment scenario is option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about this one. Isn't Conjur supposed to be a secure solution? Deploying it outside the Kubernetes environment sounds a bit risky to me.
upvoted 0 times
Alline
1 months ago
B) The Conjur Leader cluster is deployed outside of a Kubernetes environment; Followers can run inside or outside the environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dexter
1 months ago
A) The Leader and Followers are deployed outside of a Kubernetes environment; Standbys can run inside a Kubernetes environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tabetha
2 months ago
I think B is the correct answer, as the Conjur Leader cluster should be deployed outside the Kubernetes environment, while the Followers can be deployed either inside or outside.
upvoted 0 times
Rima
2 months ago
Yes, the Leader cluster should definitely be outside of the Kubernetes environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
2 months ago
I agree, B seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel