CyberArk Exam PAM-SEN Topic 5 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's PAM-SEN exam

Question #: 52
Topic #: 5

You need to add a new PSM server to an existing CyberArk environment.

What is the best way to determine the sizing of this server?

AReview the ''Recommended Server Specifications'' for PSMs in the CyberArk Documents website. Most Voted

BUse the specifications of any existing PSM and request a server of the same size.

CUse the CyberArk Support Knowledgebase, search for ''PSM Sizing'' and locate the Knowledgebase article related to sizing.

DRefer to the Microsoft Windows website, determine the minimum specifications required for the Operating System you are installing, and then add 4 Gb of RAM and 20 GB of disk.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Dorothea at Dec 08, 2024, 03:11 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PAM-SEN Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Daniela

3 months ago

I'd go with option E: Install a giant hamster wheel to power all the PVWAs. Redundancy AND exercise - double the fault tolerance!

upvoted 0 times

Tarra

2 months ago

B) Install more PVWAs in each data center.

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

2 months ago

C) Continuously monitor PVWA status and send users the link to another PVWA if issues are encountered.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shenika

2 months ago

A) This setup is already fault tolerant.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rozella

3 months ago

I agree with Dana. Option D seems like the most reliable solution for fault tolerance in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ryan

3 months ago

Option B? Really? Adding more PVWAs in each data center? That's like trying to fix a leaky faucet by adding more faucets. Load balancing is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Elden

2 months ago

Continuously monitor PVWA status and send users the link to another PVWA if issues are encountered.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deonna

2 months ago

Load balancing is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bernadine

3 months ago

This setup is already fault tolerant.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julie

3 months ago

Option B? Really? Adding more PVWAs in each data center? That's like trying to fix a leaky faucet by adding more faucets.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dana

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe option D is more efficient. Load balancing all PVWAs under the same URL ensures fault tolerance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gianna

3 months ago

I'm gonna have to go with option D. It's like having a backup parachute - you might not need it, but it's better to have it just in case.

upvoted 0 times

Leanora

2 months ago

I agree, having all PVWAs under the same URL can help balance the load and ensure fault tolerance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Percy

2 months ago

Option D is a good choice. It's always better to be prepared.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerrod

4 months ago

Option C sounds like a good idea, but it might be a bit of a hassle for users to keep switching between different PVWA links. Load balancing under a single URL seems more user-friendly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antione

4 months ago

I think option C is the best choice. Continuously monitoring and redirecting users to another PVWA if needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nichelle

4 months ago

I'm not sure if option A is really the best choice. Having multiple data centers with separate PVWAs doesn't automatically make it fault-tolerant, in my opinion.

upvoted 0 times

Merri

2 months ago

I agree, having multiple data centers doesn't guarantee fault tolerance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Youlanda

2 months ago

We should definitely consider load balancing all the PVWAs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sunny

3 months ago

I think option C is the way to go for fault tolerance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Destiny

3 months ago

Option B sounds like a good idea to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tandra

4 months ago

Option D seems like the way to go. Load balancing all the PVWAs under the same URL would make the setup more resilient and provide seamless access for the users.

upvoted 0 times