CyberArk Exam PAM-SEN Topic 4 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's PAM-SEN exam

Question #: 46
Topic #: 4

A customer has three data centers distributed globally and wants highly-available PSM connections in each segmented zone. In addition, the customer needs a highly-available PSM connection for the CyberArk Admins.

What will best satisfy this customer's needs?

Aone PSM per zone with a load balancer and two PSMs for Admins with a load balancer

Bsix PSMs in the mam data center with a load balancer and one PSM for Admins

Ctwo PSMs per zone with a load balancer and two PSMs for Admins with a dedicated load balancer

Dthree PSMs per zone with CyberArk built-in load balancing

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Dulce at Sep 14, 2024, 01:54 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PAM-SEN Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Valentine

4 months ago

Why not just hire a few interns to manually monitor and switch between the PSMs? That's the most cost-effective solution, right? *wink wink*

upvoted 0 times

Donte

3 months ago

D: Using CyberArk's built-in load balancing feature can help streamline the process and ensure efficient distribution of traffic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Oliva

3 months ago

C: It's important to have redundancy and failover mechanisms in place to prevent any downtime or disruptions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shonda

3 months ago

B: I agree, having multiple PSMs with load balancers ensures continuous access and better performance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aimee

3 months ago

A: That might work for a small setup, but for a global distribution with high availability needs, automated load balancing is more reliable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bo

4 months ago

Hmm, six PSMs in one data center? That's a lot of hardware! I'd go with option C to keep things distributed and redundant.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carlee

4 months ago

I think option D is the simplest and most elegant solution. Let CyberArk's built-in load balancing handle it all.

upvoted 0 times

Stevie

3 months ago

It definitely simplifies the setup and management process. Option D is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Verona

3 months ago

I agree, having three PSMs per zone with built-in load balancing seems like a reliable solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melvin

3 months ago

Option D sounds like the best choice. Let CyberArk handle the load balancing for each zone.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dulce

4 months ago

Hmm, that's a good point. I see the benefits of both options C and D now.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tennie

4 months ago

Option C is the way to go! Load balancing in each zone and for the admins is the best way to ensure high availability.

upvoted 0 times

Dierdre

3 months ago

Definitely, it's important to have redundancy and load balancing in place for highly-available PSM connections.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barrett

4 months ago

I agree, having two PSMs per zone with a load balancer and two PSMs for Admins with a dedicated load balancer covers all bases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Evan

4 months ago

Option C is the way to go! Load balancing in each zone and for the admins is the best way to ensure high availability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Martha

4 months ago

I disagree, I believe option D with CyberArk built-in load balancing is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hyun

4 months ago

You know, option A has a certain charm to it. One PSM per zone with a load balancer? Elegant and efficient. I like it!

upvoted 0 times

...

Norah

4 months ago

Oh man, I can already see the IT team high-fiving each other if they go with option D. Built-in load balancing? That's some serious laziness-reducing technology right there!

upvoted 0 times

Tonette

3 months ago

The IT team will definitely appreciate the simplicity and efficiency of option D. It's a win-win for everyone involved.

upvoted 0 times

...

Launa

4 months ago

It's definitely a smart choice for the customer. They'll have highly-available PSM connections without the need for additional load balancers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacquelyne

4 months ago

I agree, having three PSMs per zone with built-in load balancing for the CyberArk Admins is a smart move.

upvoted 0 times

...

Frederick

4 months ago

Option D sounds like the best choice. Built-in load balancing will definitely make things easier for the IT team.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dulce

5 months ago

I think option C would be the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tanja

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about having six PSMs in the main data center. Seems a bit overkill, don't you think? I'd go for option C.

upvoted 0 times

Teddy

4 months ago

Definitely, it's important to find the right balance between redundancy and efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sanjuana

4 months ago

Yeah, that way the customer's needs for highly-available PSM connections in each segmented zone and for the CyberArk Admins are both met.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carissa

4 months ago

I agree, having two PSMs per zone with a load balancer and two PSMs for Admins with a dedicated load balancer seems like a good balance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tyisha

4 months ago

Option C sounds like the best choice to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alline

5 months ago

Option C looks like the perfect solution. Redundancy in each zone and dedicated load balancing for the admins? That's what I call high availability!

upvoted 0 times

Bettina

4 months ago

I agree, having two PSMs per zone with a load balancer and two PSMs for Admins with a dedicated load balancer provides the necessary redundancy and high availability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joesph

5 months ago

Option C does seem like the best choice. Redundancy in each zone and dedicated load balancing for the admins is key for high availability.

upvoted 0 times

...