CyberArk Exam CPC-SEN Topic 3 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's CPC-SEN exam

Question #: 22
Topic #: 3

Which statement is correct about using the AllowedSafes platform parameter?

AIt allows users to access accounts in specific safes.

BIt prevents the CPM from scanning all safes, restricting it to scan only safes that match the AllowedSafes configuration.

CIt allows the CPM to access PSM safes to monitor platform configuration and connection component changes.

DIt prevents the CPM from processing pending items in the Discovery safes enforcing manual intervention to complete the onboarding process.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

The correct statement about using the AllowedSafes platform parameter is that it prevents the Central Policy Manager (CPM) from scanning all safes, restricting it to scan only safes that match the AllowedSafes configuration. This parameter is crucial in large-scale deployments where efficiency and resource management are key. By specifying which safes the CPM should manage, unnecessary scanning of irrelevant safes is avoided, thus optimizing the CPM's performance and reducing the load on the CyberArk environment. This configuration can be found in the platform management section of the CyberArk documentation.

by Marge at Dec 08, 2024, 03:20 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CPC-SEN Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Alva

2 months ago

This question is making my head spin. Safes, CPM, onboarding... I'm just going to guess and hope for the best. Maybe option D is the way to go?

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorsey

2 months ago

Option C seems interesting, but I think the CPM should only be accessing the safes it needs to monitor, not all PSM safes. Gotta go with option B.

upvoted 0 times

Lashanda

1 months ago

I see your point, but I still think option B is the most accurate.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arthur

1 months ago

Option B is definitely the correct one, it restricts the CPM to scan only safes that match the AllowedSafes configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rashida

1 months ago

I think option A is also a good choice, it allows users to access specific safes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tyisha

2 months ago

I agree, option B sounds like the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valene

2 months ago

Haha, manual intervention to complete onboarding? Sounds like a recipe for disaster. I'm going with option B.

upvoted 0 times

Sheridan

1 months ago

User 3: Yeah, option B seems like the best choice for efficiency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Casie

1 months ago

User 2: Option B makes sense, it restricts scanning to specific safes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Queenie

2 months ago

User 1: I agree, manual intervention doesn't sound efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronnie

3 months ago

I think D) It prevents the CPM from processing pending items in the Discovery safes enforcing manual intervention to complete the onboarding process makes the most sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josephine

3 months ago

I'm leaning towards option C) It allows the CPM to access PSM safes to monitor platform configuration and connection component changes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thad

3 months ago

I'm not sure about that. Doesn't the AllowedSafes parameter give users access to specific safes? That's what option A is saying.

upvoted 0 times

Elena

2 months ago

A) That's correct. Option A states that the AllowedSafes parameter allows users to access specific safes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tiera

2 months ago

B) It prevents the CPM from scanning all safes, restricting it to scan only safes that match the AllowedSafes configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mattie

2 months ago

A) It allows users to access accounts in specific safes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Viva

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe it's B) It prevents the CPM from scanning all safes, restricting it to scan only safes that match the AllowedSafes configuration.

upvoted 0 times

...