BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CWNP Exam CWSP-207 Topic 2 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWSP-207 exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 2
[All CWSP-207 Questions]

You must locate non-compliant 802.11 devices. Which one of the following tools will you use and why?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Naomi at Jul 19, 2024, 12:19 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CWSP-207 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Bette
3 months ago
Hold up, did someone say 'spectrum energy'? Sounds like we're trying to detect disturbances in the Force or something. But seriously, Option B is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Nana
1 months ago
I agree, we need to use the right tool to locate those devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
1 months ago
Yeah, that's why Option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristine
2 months ago
Spectrum analyzer can decode the PHY preamble of a non-compliant device.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rhea
3 months ago
I'm with Allene on this one. Option C is just silly, the protocol analyzer can't do that. Definitely going with B, the spectrum analyzer is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Gearldine
1 months ago
Let's go with B then, it seems like the most reliable option for finding non-compliant devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quiana
1 months ago
I'm not sure about that, I still think B is the most effective tool for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carolynn
2 months ago
I think A could also work, it can show the energy footprint of different devices using WPA or WPA2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyssa
2 months ago
I agree with you, B is the best choice for locating non-compliant 802.11 devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Allene
3 months ago
Haha, a protocol analyzer to check the 'spectrum energy'? Really? I'll stick with Option B, the spectrum analyzer seems like the right tool for the job.
upvoted 0 times
Yvonne
2 months ago
User Comment: Haha, a protocol analyzer to check the 'spectrum energy'? Really? I'll stick with Option B, the spectrum analyzer seems like the right tool for the job.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
2 months ago
I agree, the spectrum analyzer can decode the PHY preamble of non-compliant devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Horace
3 months ago
That's true, a protocol analyzer can report on security settings and compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
3 months ago
But wouldn't a protocol analyzer be better to check security settings?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
3 months ago
I'm more inclined towards D. A protocol analyzer can give us the full scoop on those rogue 802.11 devices, including their security settings and compliance issues.
upvoted 0 times
Tamra
2 months ago
Yeah, D sounds like the most efficient choice for locating those rogue 802.11 devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
2 months ago
A spectrum analyzer might also be useful to see the energy footprint of the devices, but D sounds more thorough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
2 months ago
I agree, a protocol analyzer seems like the most comprehensive tool for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
3 months ago
I think D is the best option. It can give us all the details we need about those non-compliant devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Geoffrey
4 months ago
I agree, a spectrum analyzer can show the energy footprint of non-compliant devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
4 months ago
Option B seems the way to go. A spectrum analyzer can decode that PHY preamble and tell us exactly what's up with those non-compliant devices.
upvoted 0 times
Fernanda
2 months ago
Devorah: It's the most efficient way to pinpoint the non-compliant 802.11 devices in the network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
2 months ago
Definitely, it gives us a clear picture of what's going on with those devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
2 months ago
I agree, using a spectrum analyzer to decode the PHY preamble is crucial in finding non-compliant devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalind
2 months ago
I agree. It's important to have that level of insight when trying to locate non-compliant 802.11 devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Burma
3 months ago
Yeah, that's true. It can give us detailed information about what's going on with those devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
3 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. A spectrum analyzer can decode the PHY preamble of non-compliant devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Horace
4 months ago
I think I would use a spectrum analyzer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel