BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CWNP Exam CWISA-102 Topic 3 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWISA-102 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 3
[All CWISA-102 Questions]

When deploying devices in an indoor manufacturing environment, which IP rating is more likely to be required?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

IP Ratings & Manufacturing:IP66 provides:

Dust-tight:(First '6') Complete protection against dust ingress.

Powerful Water Jets:(Second '6') Protection against strong water jets from any direction.

Harsh Manufacturing Environments:IP66 is common due to dust, dirt, and potential exposure to liquids during cleaning or spills.

References

IP Ratings:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_Code


Contribute your Thoughts:

Willard
2 months ago
I think IP66 is the best choice because it offers protection against dust and water.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shasta
2 months ago
If the environment is really that harsh, maybe they should consider handing out scuba gear instead of IP-rated devices.
upvoted 0 times
Evangelina
18 days ago
Scuba gear might be a bit extreme, but IP38 definitely wouldn't cut it in that environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
24 days ago
B) IP38
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
1 months ago
I think IP66 would be more suitable for a harsh indoor manufacturing environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
1 months ago
D) IP66
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
1 months ago
A) IP47
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Arlen
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but IP66 seems like the most waterproof option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
2 months ago
I agree with Ranee, IP66 makes sense for indoor manufacturing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ranee
2 months ago
I think the answer is D) IP66.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felice
2 months ago
I heard the IP in IP46 stands for 'I Protect' - at least that's what my boss told me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
2 months ago
IP47? Might as well just throw the devices in a fish tank and call it a day. IP46 is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Frank
1 months ago
IP46 is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
2 months ago
IP47? Might as well just throw the devices in a fish tank and call it a day.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nicolette
2 months ago
Hold up, IP38? What is this, a submarine? IP46 all the way, my dudes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patti
3 months ago
IP66 seems a bit overkill for an indoor setting. I'd go with IP46 to balance protection and cost-effectiveness.
upvoted 0 times
Edelmira
1 months ago
I think IP46 is the way to go for indoor manufacturing environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darell
2 months ago
Yeah, IP46 should provide enough protection without being too expensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmelina
2 months ago
I agree, IP66 does seem like too much for indoors. IP46 sounds like a good compromise.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Terrilyn
3 months ago
I think IP46 is the right choice for an indoor manufacturing environment. It provides decent protection against dust and water splashes.
upvoted 0 times
Georgene
2 months ago
IP38 is definitely not enough for a manufacturing environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
2 months ago
IP47 might be overkill for indoor use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
2 months ago
I think IP66 would be better for more protection against dust and water.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesse
2 months ago
I agree, IP46 should be sufficient for indoor manufacturing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel