Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CrowdStrike Exam CCFA-200 Topic 6 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for CrowdStrike's CCFA-200 exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 6
[All CCFA-200 Questions]

Which of the follow should be used with extreme caution because it may introduce additional security risks such as malware or other attacks which would not be recorded, detected, or prevented based on the exclusion syntax?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The option that should be used with extreme caution because it may introduce additional security risks such as malware or other attacks which would not be recorded, detected, or prevented based on the exclusion syntax is IOA Exclusions. An IOA (indicator of attack) exclusion allows you to define custom rules for excluding suspicious behavior from detection or prevention based on process execution, file write, network connection, or registry events. However, using IOA exclusions may reduce the visibility and protection of the Falcon sensor, as it may allow malicious activity to bypass the sensor's detection and prevention capabilities.Therefore, you should use IOA exclusions with extreme caution and only when necessary2.


by Izetta at Sep 18, 2024, 01:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCFA-200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Goldie
2 months ago
Ooh, this is a tricky one. But I'd have to say B) Machine Learning Exclusions. You might as well just hand over your computer to the hackers if you go with that option. *shakes head*
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
2 months ago
Wow, this is a tough one. But I think I'd have to agree with Azalee - C) IOC Exclusions is just begging for trouble. *chuckles* Might as well roll out the red carpet for the hackers, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettyann
2 months ago
Hmm, I'd have to go with A) Sensor Visibility Exclusion. Anything that could hide potential threats is a big no-no in my book.
upvoted 0 times
Ronnie
7 days ago
D) IOA Exclusions should be approached with caution as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
9 days ago
Machine Learning Exclusions, option B, can also be tricky to handle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thurman
21 days ago
I think C) IOC Exclusions could also be dangerous if not used carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
1 months ago
I agree, A) Sensor Visibility Exclusion is definitely risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimberlie
2 months ago
I don't know, guys. All of these options sound pretty sketchy to me. If I had to choose, I'd say D) IOA Exclusions, just to be on the safe side.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
2 months ago
B) Machine Learning Exclusions? Are you kidding me? That's just asking for trouble. Might as well roll out the red carpet for hackers.
upvoted 0 times
Olga
1 months ago
D) IOA Exclusions should not be overlooked either. We have to be thorough in our approach to security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fannie
2 months ago
C) IOC Exclusions are also important to consider. We need to cover all our bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
2 months ago
A) Sensor Visibility Exclusion is definitely the way to go. We can't risk leaving any loopholes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chun
2 months ago
IOC Exclusions? Might as well just put up a big neon sign that says 'Hackers Welcome!' Not happening on my watch.
upvoted 0 times
Mireya
1 months ago
D) IOA Exclusions might be the best choice to avoid security risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
1 months ago
C) IOC Exclusions definitely not worth the risk, too dangerous.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeff
1 months ago
B) Machine Learning Exclusions could be risky, better to be cautious.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
2 months ago
A) Sensor Visibility Exclusion sounds like the safest option to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Azalee
2 months ago
Definitely go with C) IOC Exclusions - that one seems like a major security risk! I'm not messing with anything that could let in malware on my watch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
2 months ago
IOA Exclusions? Seriously, who thought that was a good idea? It's like asking the wolf to guard the henhouse.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martin
3 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think B) Machine Learning Exclusions is the riskiest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
3 months ago
Sensor Visibility Exclusion? More like 'Blindfold the Security Team' if you ask me. I'm not falling for that one.
upvoted 0 times
Glen
2 months ago
D) IOA Exclusions
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
2 months ago
C) IOC Exclusions
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
2 months ago
A) Sensor Visibility Exclusion
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Junita
3 months ago
Machine Learning Exclusions? Sounds like a great way to teach the system to turn a blind eye to potential threats. I'll pass on that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
3 months ago
IOC Exclusions? That's like saying 'Let's just ignore the red flags and hope for the best.' No thanks, I'll stick with the safer options.
upvoted 0 times
Diego
2 months ago
B) Machine Learning Exclusions might be the safest bet in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
2 months ago
D) IOA Exclusions could potentially open up vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
2 months ago
C) IOC Exclusions definitely seem like a dangerous choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
3 months ago
A) Sensor Visibility Exclusion sounds risky, better to be safe than sorry.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alva
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's C) IOC Exclusions because they can introduce security risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martin
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) Machine Learning Exclusions.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel