Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CrowdStrike Exam CCFA-200 Topic 13 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for CrowdStrike's CCFA-200 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 13
[All CCFA-200 Questions]

Which of the following scenarios best describes when you would add IP addresses to the containment policy?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The option that should be used with extreme caution because it may introduce additional security risks such as malware or other attacks which would not be recorded, detected, or prevented based on the exclusion syntax is IOA Exclusions. An IOA (indicator of attack) exclusion allows you to define custom rules for excluding suspicious behavior from detection or prevention based on process execution, file write, network connection, or registry events. However, using IOA exclusions may reduce the visibility and protection of the Falcon sensor, as it may allow malicious activity to bypass the sensor's detection and prevention capabilities.Therefore, you should use IOA exclusions with extreme caution and only when necessary2.


by Louis at Apr 28, 2024, 09:37 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CCFA-200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Dannette
2 months ago
I'm just going to choose A and hope for the best. Automating things is always the way to go, right? What could possibly go wrong?
upvoted 0 times
Argelia
1 days ago
User 2: I agree, automation is usually the way to go. It can make things more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darci
2 days ago
User 1: I think A is the best option. Automating the process can save time and reduce errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fabiola
2 months ago
B is just asking for trouble. Giving the Falcon console access to more IP addresses could introduce security risks.
upvoted 0 times
Xenia
13 days ago
D) Your organization has resources that need to be accessible when hosts are network contained
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
15 days ago
C) A new group of analysts need to be able to place hosts under Network Containment
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
1 months ago
A) You want to automate the Network Containment process based on the IP address of a host
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Regenia
2 months ago
C seems a bit strange. Why would analysts need to place hosts under containment? Isn't that more of an IT/security function?
upvoted 0 times
Ronnie
24 days ago
D) Your organization has resources that need to be accessible when hosts are network contained
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrina
28 days ago
B) Your organization has additional IP addresses that need to be able to access the Falcon console
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
2 months ago
A) You want to automate the Network Containment process based on the IP address of a host
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elfrieda
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D might be the right answer. If the organization has resources that need to be accessible during containment, that could be a valid scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Katie
22 days ago
Lashandra: That's true, it could also be a good reason to add IP addresses to the policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
29 days ago
User 3: What about A? Automating the process based on IP address could also be a valid scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashandra
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, having resources accessible during containment is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
2 months ago
User 1: I think D is the best scenario for adding IP addresses to the containment policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Madelyn
3 months ago
I see both points, but I think C) is also crucial for allowing new analysts to place hosts under containment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe D) is more important as it ensures resources are still accessible during containment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ona
3 months ago
I think A) is the best scenario because it allows for automation based on IP address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
3 months ago
A sounds like the most logical answer here. Automating the containment process based on IP addresses would make the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
Martin
28 days ago
User 4: Plus, it would help with managing access to resources during containment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosalia
2 months ago
User 3: It would save time and ensure the right hosts are contained.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
2 months ago
User 2: Definitely, automating the process based on IP addresses would be efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, option A seems like the best choice for adding IP addresses to the containment policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel