BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Copado Exam Copado-Developer Topic 10 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Copado's Copado-Developer exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 10
[All Copado-Developer Questions]

Dave has been assigned the task of deleting a custom object that has not been used in

production for a long time. After committing the destructive changes, he notices that no

feature branch has been created. What could be the reason?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Lai at Sep 14, 2024, 05:03 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Copado-Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Miesha
14 days ago
This is why we double-check our work, folks. I'm guessing Dave just got a little too eager and forgot to verify the API name. Classic case of option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pauline
15 days ago
Haha, oh Dave. Sounds like he's got some butter fingers today. I'd put my money on option D - that misspelled API name is probably the culprit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyman
16 days ago
Option C seems the most likely to me. The 'Re-Create Feature Branch' checkbox is crucial, and if Dave missed that, no wonder he didn't see a new branch pop up.
upvoted 0 times
Scot
2 days ago
A) The base branch was set to master branch, and the component was not yet in production.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Estrella
17 days ago
I'd say it's option A. If the base branch was set to master and the component wasn't in production, deleting it wouldn't require a feature branch. Simple as that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benedict
18 days ago
Hmm, I'm guessing it's option D. Dave must have typo'd the API name, and that's why the feature branch wasn't created. Rookie mistake, but we've all been there, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
19 days ago
B) Not having the rights to delete the component? Classic. Dave should have checked his permissions before diving in. Gotta cover all your bases, my friend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
21 days ago
D) Definitely the answer here. Dave's gotta be more careful with those metadata API names. One misspelled character and your whole delete operation goes down the drain. Tsk, tsk.
upvoted 0 times
Melina
1 days ago
D) Definitely the answer here. Dave's gotta be more careful with those metadata API names. One misspelled character and your whole delete operation goes down the drain. Tsk, tsk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearlene
8 days ago
A) The base branch was set to master branch, and the component was not yet in production.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felicia
1 months ago
I think it could also be option A, if the base branch was set to master and the component was not in production yet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
1 months ago
I agree with Mirta, option D seems like a possible reason for the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
2 months ago
I think the reason could be option D, Dave might have misspelled the API name.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geraldo
2 months ago
Ah, the classic case of the missing feature branch! Looks like Dave's got himself in a pickle. I bet he's kicking himself for not creating that branch first. Rookie mistake, really.
upvoted 0 times
Lachelle
1 months ago
C) The Re-Create Feature Branch checkbox was not flagged.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alona
1 months ago
B) He did not have rights to delete the component in the source org.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
2 months ago
A) The base branch was set to master branch, and the component was not yet in production.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel