D? Really? I mean, sure, tokenization can work for that, but it seems a bit overkill. Wouldn't basic data masking or segmentation be enough in that case? Save the tokenization for the financial stuff, you know?
You guys are spot on. Tokenization is the perfect solution for that scenario. Although, I could see an argument for option D as well, if you're dealing with highly sensitive personal data in a database.
I agree, C is the way to go. Tokenization is the gold standard for protecting customer payment info. Plus, it makes things super easy for the users - they don't have to worry about their card details being compromised.
Hmm, I think option C is the best here. Tokenization is great for securely storing sensitive financial data like credit card numbers. It's a lot safer than having the actual card numbers in the database.
upvoted 0 times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
Sign in:
Report Comment
Is the comment made by USERNAME spam or abusive?
Commenting
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can sign-up or
login
Vanesa
8 months agoGilberto
8 months agoJanine
8 months agoKristel
8 months agoLucina
8 months agoClarence
8 months agoCassi
8 months agoNada
8 months agoErinn
8 months ago