Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CompTIA Exam SK0-005 Topic 2 Question 66 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's SK0-005 exam
Question #: 66
Topic #: 2
[All SK0-005 Questions]

A server administrator is replacing a faulty PSU. The management team has asked for a solution that prevents further downtime in the future. Which of the following can the server administrator implement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

A faulty PSU needs replacement, and the management team wants a solution to prevent future downtime.

Solution:Implementredundancy(Option D):

Redundant power supplies ensure that if one fails, the other takes over seamlessly.

Separate circuits, load balancing, and server monitoring are important but do not directly prevent PSU failures.


by An at Sep 12, 2024, 11:01 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SK0-005 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Helene
27 days ago
Server monitoring, huh? I mean, that's cool and all, but it won't do much good if the power goes out. Redundancy is the obvious choice, my dude.
upvoted 0 times
Winifred
12 hours ago
I agree, having a backup power supply is crucial for preventing future issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
10 days ago
Redundancy is definitely the way to go. We can't afford any more downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shawnna
1 months ago
I think server monitoring could also help in preventing future downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
1 months ago
Load balancing? Nah, that's for traffic, not power. Separate circuits seem like a good idea, but redundancy is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Lashon
9 days ago
B: I agree, having a backup in place is crucial for situations like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sean
23 days ago
A: Redundancy is definitely the best option to prevent downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jill
1 months ago
I agree with Annamae, redundancy would prevent further downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
1 months ago
I think the server administrator should implement redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
1 months ago
Definitely redundancy! Gotta have that backup power supply, you know? No more sudden shutdowns for this guy.
upvoted 0 times
Shasta
18 days ago
I think we should go with redundancy too. It's the best solution for preventing future downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
24 days ago
Agreed, having a backup power supply is crucial for preventing sudden shutdowns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cletus
1 months ago
Redundancy is definitely the way to go. Can't afford any more downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Avery
2 months ago
Server monitoring, huh? I mean, that's cool and all, but it won't do much good if the power goes out. Redundancy is the obvious choice, my dude.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
2 months ago
Load balancing? Nah, that's for traffic, not power. Separate circuits seem like a good idea, but redundancy is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Kassandra
6 days ago
Server monitoring is important, but it won't prevent downtime like redundancy would.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
13 days ago
Separate circuits could help too, but redundancy is more effective in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
24 days ago
I agree, having a backup power supply in place is crucial for server reliability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
1 months ago
Redundancy is definitely the best option to prevent future downtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glory
2 months ago
Definitely redundancy! Gotta have that backup power supply, you know? No more sudden shutdowns for this guy.
upvoted 0 times
Naomi
1 months ago
Agreed, redundancy is the way to go. It's essential for ensuring continuous operation of the server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
1 months ago
Definitely redundancy! Gotta have that backup power supply, you know? No more sudden shutdowns for this guy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel