CompTIA SK0-005 Exam - Topic 1 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's SK0-005 exam

Question #: 52
Topic #: 1

A server administrator is replacing a faulty PSU. The management team has asked for a solution that prevents further downtime in the future. Which of the following can the server administrator implement?

ASeparate circuits

BLoad balancing

CServer monitoring

DRedundancy

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

A faulty PSU needs replacement, and the management team wants a solution to prevent future downtime.

Solution:Implementredundancy(Option D):

Redundant power supplies ensure that if one fails, the other takes over seamlessly.

Separate circuits, load balancing, and server monitoring are important but do not directly prevent PSU failures.

by Susana at Apr 28, 2024, 09:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SK0-005 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Daren

8 months ago

Definitely go for redundancy, it's a must-have!

upvoted 0 times

...

Raylene

8 months ago

Wait, can redundancy really prevent all downtime?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ligia

9 months ago

I think separate circuits could be useful too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nieves

9 months ago

Load balancing won't help with PSU issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hermila

9 months ago

Redundancy is key to preventing downtime!

upvoted 0 times

...

Kati

9 months ago

Separate circuits could help, but I think redundancy is the more common solution for power supply issues.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorean

9 months ago

I feel like server monitoring is important, but it doesn't directly prevent downtime. It just helps us react faster, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Pa

10 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think load balancing is more about distributing traffic rather than preventing hardware failures.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francesco

10 months ago

I remember discussing redundancy in class; it seems like the best option to prevent future downtime.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luis

10 months ago

Separate circuits could work, but that might be overkill. I'm leaning towards the redundancy option as the most practical solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joanne

10 months ago

Redundancy is definitely the way to go here. Gotta make sure that single point of failure doesn't bring the whole system down.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janet

10 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review my notes on server hardware and high availability solutions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reita

10 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about redundancy and fault tolerance. I'll think through the options carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jose

10 months ago

Load balancing? Not sure how that would help with a faulty power supply. I think I'll go with the redundancy choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Claudio

10 months ago

Okay, I've got this. Truffle is the Ethereum development framework, not a Java library. So option C is definitely wrong. And while option B about connecting to Ethereum nodes sounds plausible, I'm pretty sure the main purpose of Truffle is for the testing and deployment of smart contracts, so I'll go with A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Azalee

10 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm trying to decide between A - requirements and D - risk assessments. I'll have to think it through carefully before answering.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lettie

10 months ago

The Act phase is where you take the necessary actions to continually improve the process performance, right? I think that's the best answer based on my understanding of the PDCA methodology.

upvoted 0 times

...