MENU
A server administrator is replacing a faulty PSU. The management team has asked for a solution that prevents further downtime in the future. Which of the following can the server administrator implement?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium SK0-005 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
A faulty PSU needs replacement, and the management team wants a solution to prevent future downtime.
Solution:Implementredundancy(Option D):
Redundant power supplies ensure that if one fails, the other takes over seamlessly.
Separate circuits, load balancing, and server monitoring are important but do not directly prevent PSU failures.
23 comments · newest first
DA
Daren
11 months ago
Definitely go for redundancy, it's a must-have!
RA
Raylene
11 months ago
Wait, can redundancy really prevent all downtime?
LI
Ligia
11 months ago
I think separate circuits could be useful too.
NI
Nieves
11 months ago
Load balancing won't help with PSU issues.
HE
Hermila
11 months ago
Redundancy is key to preventing downtime!
KA
Kati
12 months ago
Separate circuits could help, but I think redundancy is the more common solution for power supply issues.
LO
Lorean
12 months ago
I feel like server monitoring is important, but it doesn't directly prevent downtime. It just helps us react faster, right?
PA
Pa
12 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think load balancing is more about distributing traffic rather than preventing hardware failures.
FR
Francesco
1 year ago
I remember discussing redundancy in class; it seems like the best option to prevent future downtime.
LU
Luis
1 year ago
Separate circuits could work, but that might be overkill. I'm leaning towards the redundancy option as the most practical solution.
JO
Joanne
1 year ago
Redundancy is definitely the way to go here. Gotta make sure that single point of failure doesn't bring the whole system down.
JA
Janet
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review my notes on server hardware and high availability solutions.
RE
Reita
1 year ago
This seems like a straightforward question about redundancy and fault tolerance. I'll think through the options carefully.
JO
Jose
1 year ago
Load balancing? Not sure how that would help with a faulty power supply. I think I'll go with the redundancy choice.
CL
Claudio
1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. Truffle is the Ethereum development framework, not a Java library. So option C is definitely wrong. And while option B about connecting to Ethereum nodes sounds plausible, I'm pretty sure the main purpose of Truffle is for the testing and deployment of smart contracts, so I'll go with A.
AZ
Azalee
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'm trying to decide between A - requirements and D - risk assessments. I'll have to think it through carefully before answering.
LE
Lettie
1 year ago
The Act phase is where you take the necessary actions to continually improve the process performance, right? I think that's the best answer based on my understanding of the PDCA methodology.
MA
Mariko
2 years ago
Server monitoring can alert us, but it won’t prevent downtime like redundancy.
GA
Gayla
2 years ago
Agreed. Redundant PSUs can switch if one fails.
RU
Ruthann
2 years ago
I think Redundancy is the answer. PSUs with redundancy can ensure continuous power.
DA
Davida
2 years ago
Nah, load balancing won't help with a power supply issue.
NE
Nelida
2 years ago
Definitely. What about load balancing? It helps distribute the load evenly.
SH
Shalon
2 years ago
Replacing a PSU again? We need a solution that actually works.