Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CompTIA Exam PT0-003 Topic 4 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's PT0-003 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 4
[All PT0-003 Questions]

During an assessment, a penetration tester wants to extend the vulnerability search to include the use of dynamic testing. Which of the following tools should the tester use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST):

Definition: DAST involves testing the application in its running state to identify vulnerabilities that could be exploited by an attacker.

Purpose: Simulates attacks on a live application, examining how it behaves and identifying security weaknesses.

ZAP (Zed Attack Proxy):

Description: An open-source DAST tool developed by OWASP.

Features: Capable of scanning web applications for vulnerabilities, including SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, and other common web application vulnerabilities.

Usage: Ideal for dynamic testing as it interacts with the live application and identifies vulnerabilities that may not be visible in static code analysis.

Other Tools:

Mimikatz: Used for post-exploitation activities, specifically credential dumping on Windows systems.

OllyDbg: A debugger used for reverse engineering and static analysis of binary files, not suitable for dynamic testing.

SonarQube: A static code analysis tool used for SAST (Static Application Security Testing), not for dynamic testing.

Pentest Reference:

Web Application Security Testing: Utilizing DAST tools like ZAP to dynamically test and find vulnerabilities in running web applications.

OWASP Tools: Leveraging open-source tools recommended by OWASP for comprehensive security testing.

By using ZAP, the penetration tester can perform dynamic testing to identify runtime vulnerabilities in web applications, extending the scope of the vulnerability search.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Jonelle
2 months ago
Mimikatz? Really? That's for credential dumping, not vulnerability testing. I think we need to keep our focus on the task at hand here, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renato
2 months ago
SonarQube? More like SonarSnooze, am I right? That's for static code analysis, not dynamic testing. I'll have to go with ZAP on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Jarvis
30 days ago
Definitely, ZAP is a great tool for dynamic testing. It's the best choice in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
1 months ago
I agree, SonarQube is not for dynamic testing. ZAP is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sherell
2 months ago
I think OllyDbg is not suitable for dynamic testing, so I would go with ZAP or SonarQube.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
2 months ago
I believe SonarQube could also be a good option for dynamic testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vonda
2 months ago
Ooh, OllyDbg! Now that's an old-school debugger. Gotta love those retro tools, am I right? But I don't think that's what the question is asking for.
upvoted 0 times
Serina
1 months ago
D) SonarQube
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashad
1 months ago
C) OllyDbg
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
1 months ago
B) ZAP
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
1 months ago
A) Mimikatz
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rolande
2 months ago
I agree with Vernell, ZAP is a great tool for dynamic testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernell
2 months ago
I think the penetration tester should use ZAP for dynamic testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Argelia
3 months ago
ZAP definitely seems like the way to go here. Dynamic testing is all about the web, and ZAP is the king of web app security testing.
upvoted 0 times
Brunilda
2 months ago
I've used ZAP before, it's great for finding vulnerabilities in web applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
2 months ago
I agree, ZAP is perfect for dynamic testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel