Penetration on an assessment for a client organization, a penetration tester notices numerous outdated software package versions were installed ...s-critical servers. Which of the following would best mitigate this issue?
Okay, let's break this down. The key is mitigating the issue of outdated software on critical servers. A patching program seems like the obvious solution, but I want to make sure I'm not missing anything else that could work better.
This seems like a straightforward question. The best answer is clearly A - implementing patching and change control programs to keep software up-to-date.
Hmm, I'm a little confused by the wording here. I'll need to re-read the question carefully to make sure I grasp the distinction between the two approaches.
Okay, I've got this. The key is to look for the option that mentions "Correlation Searches" specifically. That's going to be the most direct way to get to the list of enabled correlation searches. I'm going with option A.
Yeah, I'm with Oren on this one. Option A gives you a more comprehensive fix. Although, I do have to say, the idea of refraining from patching until QA approves in Option D is just plain ridiculous. That would be the worst thing to do!
That's a fair point, Javier. But I'm worried that Option B is a bit too specific. Patching and change control are more overarching solutions that can address the root cause, rather than just fixing the symptoms.
I see your point, but wouldn't revising client scripts be a temporary fix? Patching and change control programs seem like a more comprehensive solution.
Markus
5 days agoMartin
5 days agoDelmy
12 days agoHarrison
13 days agoAshley
2 years agoCurt
2 years agoOren
2 years agoOra
1 years agoLuz
1 years agoHoward
1 years agoNicolette
1 years agoCaprice
1 years ago