Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CompTIA Exam FC0-U61 Topic 3 Question 69 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's FC0-U61 exam
Question #: 69
Topic #: 3
[All FC0-U61 Questions]

Which of the following license types would be most cost effective for an organization if all users need to access software but not on a consistent basis?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

A concurrent license would be most cost-effective for an organization where all users need access to software but not at the same time. Concurrent licenses allow a certain number of users to access the software simultaneously, regardless of who those users are. This type of licensing is efficient and economical for environments with variable software usage patterns. Reference: Licensing models and their applications are discussed in CompTIA IT Fundamentals, which includes various types of software licenses and their suitability for different organizational needs.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lemuel
14 days ago
Dude, the Single-use license is where it's at! Just buy a license for each user who needs it. Simple, straightforward, and no worrying about that pesky 'concurrent' thing. Plus, it's like having your own personal copy of the software. Kinda like having your own personal genie, but without the whole 'three wishes' thing.
upvoted 0 times
Antonio
16 hours ago
A) Site
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sunshine
17 days ago
Ooh, I'm feeling the Device license. That way, each user can have their own dedicated device to use the software on. No more fighting over who gets to use it, am I right? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
1 months ago
I see your point, Candra. Concurrent does seem like a good option for organizations with fluctuating software usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
1 months ago
Haha, yeah, the Device license does sound like a personal genie. But I think I'd rather have the whole organization using the Site license and just sharing the wealth, you know? No need for any 'me-first' attitudes here.
upvoted 0 times
Bethanie
7 days ago
Definitely, no need for any 'me-first' attitudes with that option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunny
12 days ago
I think the Site license promotes teamwork and collaboration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
16 days ago
Yeah, it would definitely be more cost effective for the organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hollis
23 days ago
I agree, the Site license seems like the best option for sharing resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Essie
1 months ago
Definitely go for the Concurrent license. It's the most flexible and cost-effective option if users don't need constant access. Just gotta make sure not to exceed the maximum number of concurrent users, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Jin
6 days ago
Just need to keep an eye on those concurrent user limits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
7 days ago
Yeah, it's great for organizations with fluctuating software usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
8 days ago
Concurrent license is the way to go for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martha
10 days ago
Concurrent license can save a lot of money in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dante
14 days ago
Just need to keep an eye on the number of users accessing at the same time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
15 days ago
Yeah, it's great for organizations with fluctuating software usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
19 days ago
Concurrent license is the way to go for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candra
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe Concurrent would be more cost effective because it allows multiple users to access the software at the same time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 months ago
I think the most cost effective license type would be Single-use.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel