Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CompTIA Exam CV0-004 Topic 3 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's CV0-004 exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 3
[All CV0-004 Questions]

An administrator configures three subnets to the corporate network. All servers should communicate with the main corporate network and access the internet. The administrator creates the following configurations:

After configuring the networks, the administrator recognizes an issue with the configuration. Which of the following can the administrator change in one step to accomplish the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

A . Remove 192.168.12.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24: This would cause connectivity issues for Network 4.

B . Replace 192.168.1.0/24 with 192.168.0.0/24: Corrects the incorrect destination for Network 4, aligning it with the corporate network subnet.

C . Add 192.168.12.0/24 and 192.168.0.0/24: Duplicates an existing configuration and doesn't solve the issue.

D . Reconfigure Network 4 to 192.168.13.0/24: Alters the network unnecessarily and doesn't resolve the destination routing issue.


CompTIA Cloud+ CV0-004 Study Guide, Objective 2.2: Configure routing tables to ensure proper network communication.

by Mable at Mar 07, 2025, 12:14 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CV0-004 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Detra
4 days ago
I'm feeling a bit mischievous today, so I'm going to go with A. Removing the source and destination from the routing table? Now that's what I call a power move. Let's see the administrator try to figure that one out!
upvoted 0 times
...
Martin
5 days ago
Why do you think that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
6 days ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
8 days ago
Haha, this is a tough one. I'm torn between B and C, but I think I'll go with B. Replacing the destination just seems like the most elegant solution. Plus, who doesn't love a good subnet swap?
upvoted 0 times
Vivienne
2 hours ago
User2: Yeah, I think so too. It's a simple change that could fix the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
3 days ago
User1: I agree, replacing the destination subnet does seem like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thomasena
13 days ago
Because replacing the destination subnet will allow all servers to communicate with the main network and access the internet.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
20 days ago
I'm going to have to go with D on this one. Reconfiguring Network 4 to 192.168.13.0/24 seems like the most logical approach. Who needs the corporate network anyway? Let's just make our own!
upvoted 0 times
Arthur
3 days ago
We can figure that out later. Let's just reconfigure Network 4 for now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
7 days ago
But what about the servers needing to communicate with the main corporate network?
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
8 days ago
I think D is the best option too. Let's just make our own network!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Martin
20 days ago
Why do you think so?
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
24 days ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azalee
26 days ago
Nah, I'm going with C. Adding the source and destination to the routing table seems like the best way to accomplish the goal. Can't go wrong with a little more information, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
28 days ago
Hmm, I think the answer is B. Replacing the destination with 192.168.0.0/24 should do the trick. It's the most straightforward change to make.
upvoted 0 times
Tiera
1 days ago
User2: Yeah, I agree. Changing the destination to 192.168.0.0/24 should fix the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
2 days ago
User1: I think the answer is B. It seems like the most straightforward change to make.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel