Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CompTIA Exam CAS-004 Topic 4 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's CAS-004 exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 4
[All CAS-004 Questions]

A company is in the process of refreshing its entire infrastructure The company has a business-critical process running on an old 2008 Windows server If this server fails, the company would lose millions of dollars in revenue. Which of the following actions should the company should take?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Calculating the Annual Loss Expectancy (ALE) and conducting a cost-benefit analysis is a critical part of risk management. The ALE will help the company understand the potential losses associated with the server failure per year, which can then be weighed against the cost of mitigating the risk (e.g., replacing the server or implementing redundancies). This analysis will inform the decision on the best course of action to manage the risk associated with the aging server.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Heidy
4 months ago
Yes, it could help offset the cost of failure and provide some peace of mind.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
4 months ago
Purchasing insurance could also be a good option, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kyoko
4 months ago
I believe so. It would provide a clear picture of the potential costs and benefits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heidy
4 months ago
Would calculating the ALE and conducting a cost-benefit analysis be helpful in this situation?
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
4 months ago
I agree. Losing millions in revenue is a huge risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heidy
5 months ago
I think the company should consider all options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
5 months ago
I believe purchasing insurance could be a good backup plan in case all else fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
5 months ago
So, should we purchase insurance to offset the cost if a failure occurred?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
5 months ago
I agree, we need to weigh the cost of taking action versus the cost of potential failure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyndy
6 months ago
I think calculating the ALE and conducting a cost-benefit analysis would be the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
6 months ago
We can't afford to lose millions of dollars in revenue if the server fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teresita
7 months ago
Hmm, I don't know. Option D, purchasing insurance, might be the easiest way to go. At least they'd have some protection if the worst happens.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
7 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C, calculating the ALE and doing a cost-benefit analysis. That way they can make an informed decision based on the actual risk and potential impact.
upvoted 0 times
Flo
6 months ago
Absolutely, it's better to be proactive and prevent losses rather than deal with them afterwards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
6 months ago
Taking proactive steps to mitigate risks can save the company a lot of money in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evelynn
6 months ago
If they understand the financial impact, they can prioritize their actions effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
6 months ago
I agree, making informed decisions based on data is crucial for success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnta
6 months ago
It's important for the company to quantify the risk and weigh it against the potential cost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantay
6 months ago
Calculating the ALE and doing a cost-benefit analysis sounds like a solid plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rory
7 months ago
Yeah, no kidding. Losing millions in revenue if that server fails? That's a disaster waiting to happen. They need to act fast on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
7 months ago
Wow, this is a tough one. The company is really in a tough spot with that old 2008 Windows server running a critical process. I'd be sweating bullets if I were them!
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel