Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CompTIA Exam CAS-004 Topic 2 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's CAS-004 exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 2
[All CAS-004 Questions]

A company reviews the regulatory requirements associated with a new product, and then company management elects to cancel production. Which of the following risk strategies is the company using in this scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

In this scenario, the company has elected to cancel the production of a product after reviewing regulatory requirements. This decision reflects a risk avoidance strategy, which involves taking action to eliminate exposure to a risk by not engaging in the activity that could lead to it. By canceling production, the company avoids the regulatory and compliance risks altogether. CASP+ defines risk avoidance as a risk management strategy that involves stopping or avoiding actions that expose the organization to unacceptable levels of risk.


CASP+ CAS-004 Exam Objectives: Domain 1.0 -- Risk Management (Risk Avoidance)

CompTIA CASP+ Study Guide: Risk Management Strategies and Risk Avoidance

Contribute your Thoughts:

Loren
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the management team was like, 'Regulations? What regulations? We're just going to pretend this product doesn't exist.' Avoidance all the way, baby!
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
2 months ago
Acceptance? Are you kidding me? This company is clearly trying to avoid any potential headaches. I'm going with 'avoidance' on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Oliva
25 days ago
Avoidance is the way to go in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
26 days ago
I agree, they definitely don't want to deal with any regulatory issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
1 months ago
Yeah, acceptance would be too risky in this case. Avoidance is the smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Craig
1 months ago
Avoidance is definitely the way to go here, better safe than sorry.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
1 months ago
Avoidance
upvoted 0 times
...
Dawne
1 months ago
I think rejection could also be a valid option, but avoidance is probably the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
2 months ago
I agree, avoidance seems like the best strategy in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tegan
2 months ago
Mitigation? Nah, that's for the weak. I say they went with the good old-fashioned 'rejection' approach. Ain't nobody got time to play by the rules.
upvoted 0 times
Jacob
29 days ago
True, acceptance would have been too risky in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
1 months ago
Avoidance may be safer, but rejection shows confidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
1 months ago
But wouldn't it be safer to go with avoidance?
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
2 months ago
True, there could be some backlash. But maybe the company felt it was worth the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
2 months ago
I agree, rejection is definitely a bold move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
2 months ago
But what about the potential consequences of rejecting the regulatory requirements?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellen
2 months ago
I agree, rejection is a bold move. Sometimes you just have to take a stand.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gayla
3 months ago
I agree with Cordelia, avoiding the risk by canceling production seems like the best strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
3 months ago
I think the company is using avoidance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
3 months ago
Definitely avoidance. Who wants to deal with all those pesky regulations? Ain't nobody got time for that!
upvoted 0 times
Rochell
2 months ago
Avoidance is definitely the way to go in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
2 months ago
It's better to cancel production than deal with all the hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
2 months ago
I agree, avoiding the regulations seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
2 months ago
Avoidance
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel