A technician accidentally deleted the secret key that was corresponding to the public key pinned to a busy online magazine. To remedy the situation, the technician obtained a new certificate with a different key. However, paying subscribers were locked out of the website until the key-pinning policy expired. Which of the following alternatives should the technician adopt to prevent a similar issue in the future?
Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) is not listed directly in the provided options, but it is a relevant mechanism in the context of managing certificates and preventing issues similar to the one described. However, based on the available choices, the Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) comes closest to providing a viable solution. OCSP allows for real-time validation of a certificate's revocation status, which could mitigate the issue of users being locked out due to key pinning policies. It is a more modern and efficient alternative to Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs), offering faster and more reliable certificate status checks. By implementing OCSP, the technician could ensure that clients receive timely updates on the revocation status of certificates, potentially avoiding the downtime caused by the key-pinning policy awaiting expiration.
Cherilyn
14 days agoJanae
1 days agoSarina
16 days agoTheola
17 days agoFletcher
3 days agoBlondell
7 days agoGerardo
1 months agoSylvia
7 days agoElroy
19 days agoEffie
23 days agoKindra
1 months agoCaitlin
2 months agoTamar
2 months agoKaycee
5 days agoLenora
13 days agoCarlota
20 days agoLenora
1 months agoAleshia
2 months ago