Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Citrix Exam 1Y0-440 Topic 1 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-440 exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 1
[All 1Y0-440 Questions]

Scenario: A Citrix Architect needs to assess an existing Citrix ADC configuration. The customer recently found that members of certain administrator groups were receiving permissions on the production Citrix ADC appliances that do NOT align with the designed security requirements. Click the Exhibit button to view the configured command policies for the production Citrix ADC deployment.

To align the command policy configuration with the security requirements of the organization, the__________for________________should change. (Choose the correct option to complete the sentence.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Valentin at Nov 16, 2024, 03:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Y0-440 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Jenise
4 months ago
Ooh, I know! The action for Item 4 needs to be changed. That's the key to aligning the security requirements, I'm sure of it.
upvoted 0 times
German
3 months ago
I agree with you, changing the action for Item 4 is the best way to align with security requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Katie
3 months ago
No, I believe it's the command spec for Item 3 that needs to be adjusted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
3 months ago
But what about the priority for Item 5? Could that be the solution?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
4 months ago
I think you're right, changing the action for Item 4 is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Xuan
4 months ago
Haha, this is a tricky one. I bet the poor Citrix Architect is scratching their head right about now, trying to figure out the best way to handle this situation.
upvoted 0 times
Selma
3 months ago
User 4: I agree, the priority for Item 2 should be looked at.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
3 months ago
User 3: Maybe the action for Item 1 is the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
3 months ago
User 2: No, I believe the priority for Item 5 needs to be adjusted.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
3 months ago
User 1: I think the command spec for Item 3 should change.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherilyn
4 months ago
Hmm, I see your point. Let's review the command policies again to make sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
4 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) command spec; Item 6.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
4 months ago
Wait, hold up! Shouldn't we be changing the command spec for Item 3? That seems like the most logical choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherilyn
4 months ago
I think the answer is C) command spec; Item 3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
4 months ago
Hmm, I think the priority for Item 2 should change. The customer wants to align the security requirements, so adjusting the priority seems like the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
Jolene
3 months ago
I see your point. Priority for Item 2 it is then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonora
3 months ago
Changing the priority for Item 2 makes sense to ensure the security requirements are met.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alex
3 months ago
I think adjusting the priority for Item 2 is the best way to go in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
4 months ago
That could work too, but I think adjusting the priority might be more effective in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
4 months ago
I agree, changing the priority for Item 2 would help align the security requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
4 months ago
But what about changing the command spec for Item 3 instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
4 months ago
I agree, changing the priority for Item 2 would help align the security requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel