Citrix Exam 1Y0-403 Topic 4 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-403 exam

Question #: 84
Topic #: 4

Scenario: An additional zone was recently added to a Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops environment. The main zone is located in New York City, and a small, second zone is located in Tokyo. Within the next year, the number of users in Tokyo is expected to equal that in New York City.

A Citrix Architect recommended the addition of 2 StoreFront servers in Tokyo to support the users.

What should the architect recommend for this environment to ensure user-experience consistency and reduce WAN bandwidth consumption?

AAdd 2 StoreFront servers to separate server groups and configure subscription synchronization

BAdd 2 StoreFront servers and configure the Optimal Gateway routing feature

CAdd 2 standalone StoreFront servers

DAdd 2 StoreFront servers to the same server group

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Luisa at Apr 14, 2024, 03:36 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Y0-403 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Katheryn

6 months ago

I think option A could also work well, separating the servers into different groups and synchronizing subscriptions could help with reducing WAN bandwidth consumption.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alease

6 months ago

I'm not sure about option B, I think adding standalone StoreFront servers might be a safer bet for user-experience consistency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paul

6 months ago

I agree with you Larae, option B seems like the best choice to ensure consistent user-experience.

upvoted 0 times

...

Larae

7 months ago

I think option B sounds like a good idea because the Optimal Gateway routing feature can help with reducing WAN bandwidth consumption.

upvoted 0 times

...

Truman

7 months ago

I think option B could also work well. Configuring the Optimal Gateway routing feature could help optimize the network usage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eden

7 months ago

I agree with User1. Option A seems like the most logical choice to ensure user experience consistency.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryann

7 months ago

I disagree. I believe option D is more effective. Having the StoreFront servers in the same group would simplify management and reduce WAN bandwidth usage.

upvoted 0 times

...

My

7 months ago

I think option A is the best choice. Separate server groups could help balance the load and keep the user experience consistent.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jenelle

8 months ago

Haha, good one! But seriously, I think option B is the way to go. It's a bit more complex to set up, but it's worth it to ensure a consistent and efficient environment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnson

8 months ago

True, true. I think we need to prioritize the user experience and bandwidth efficiency here. Option B just seems like the most well-rounded solution. *chuckles* Though I suppose we could always just tell the users in Tokyo to stop watching cat videos during work hours.

upvoted 0 times

Jame

7 months ago

Yes, configuring the Optimal Gateway routing feature would definitely help.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stevie

7 months ago

I agree, Option B sounds like the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erick

8 months ago

Yeah, but then you'd have to worry about the WAN bandwidth consumption. With the two zones being equal in size, that could become a real issue if we don't have the Optimal Gateway routing in place.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merissa

8 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Option D, adding the two StoreFront servers to the same server group, could also work. It might be simpler to manage and could potentially provide a more seamless experience for users.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maxima

8 months ago

I agree with Wilburn. Option B with the Optimal Gateway routing feature seems like the most appropriate choice here. It should help reduce WAN bandwidth consumption and provide a consistent user experience across the two zones.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilburn

8 months ago

This is a tricky question. The number of users in both zones is expected to be equal, so we need a solution that ensures consistent user experience and efficient use of WAN bandwidth. I'm leaning towards option B, which seems to be the best fit for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...