Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS Exam L5M3 Topic 2 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L5M3 exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 2
[All L5M3 Questions]

Restitution damages are often calculated before contracts are signed and are clearly stated within a contract. Which of the following statements is not true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

'restitution damages cannot be mitigated by the actions of the innocent party' is the untrue state-ment out of these four. The general principle of Restitution Damages is that the innocent party is expected to be proactive in mitigating the consequences of any breach and should not allow costs to spiral out of control. See p. 124


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ryann
14 days ago
Hmm, option C sounds like the way to go. It's all about how much the breacher gained, not how much the innocent party lost. Seems fair enough.
upvoted 0 times
Annett
4 days ago
User 1: I agree, option C does seem fair. It's about making the breaching party give back what they gained.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leah
17 days ago
I think B) restitution damages may leave the breaching party in a worse position than they were in before the contract began is the incorrect statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
17 days ago
I'm pretty sure option B is the correct answer here. Restitution is about putting the parties back in their original positions, not punishing the breaching party.
upvoted 0 times
Jeniffer
6 days ago
I think you're right, option B seems to be the most accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emerson
21 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) restitution damages are calculated based on how much the breaching party gained, rather than how much the innocent party lost makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiera
28 days ago
Option D seems a bit odd. Why can't restitution damages be mitigated? Doesn't that defeat the purpose of making the breaching party whole again?
upvoted 0 times
Gayla
13 days ago
B) restitution damages may leave the breaching party in a worse position than they were in before the contract began
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnee
19 days ago
A) restitution damages means you are unable to claim for future losses
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ressie
1 months ago
Restitution damages? Sounds like a fancy way to say 'I messed up big time' to me.
upvoted 0 times
Aileen
20 hours ago
C) restitution damages are calculated based on how much the breaching party gained, rather than how much the innocent party lost
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
7 days ago
B) restitution damages may leave the breaching party in a worse position than they were in before the contract began
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
9 days ago
A) restitution damages means you are unable to claim for future losses
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lourdes
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) restitution damages cannot be mitigated by the actions of the innocent party.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
1 months ago
I think the answer is A) restitution damages means you are unable to claim for future losses.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel