Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIPS L5M3 Exam - Topic 2 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L5M3 exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 2
[All L5M3 Questions]

Franky B's is a popular restaurant chain which is seeking a resolution to a conflict it has with its supplier of Fried Chicken. It is looking for a dispute resolution that does not involve the court but in which an expert third party will make a binding decision. Which is the most suitable dispute resolution method for Franky B's?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

This is Adjudication. The other answers are incorrect- litigation involves the court. Conciliation and mediation do not provide binding decisions. P. 143


by Xuan at Jul 08, 2025, 09:29 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium L5M3 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Janey
5 months ago
Really? Binding decisions sound risky…
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
5 months ago
Wait, why not mediation? Seems more friendly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
6 months ago
Definitely agree, it’s binding and quick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
6 months ago
Adjudication fits perfectly for this situation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
6 months ago
I think adjudication is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
6 months ago
I feel like litigation is definitely not the right choice here since they want to avoid court, but I'm torn between adjudication and conciliation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
6 months ago
Conciliation sounds familiar, but I can't recall if it leads to a binding outcome like adjudication does.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
7 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think mediation is more about finding a mutual agreement rather than a binding decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
7 months ago
I think the answer might be adjudication since it involves an expert making a binding decision, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mickie
7 months ago
I think the answer is D, mediation. Even though it doesn't involve a binding decision, the question says the restaurant is looking for a "dispute resolution that does not involve the court but in which an expert third party will make a binding decision." Mediation seems to fit that description best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
7 months ago
Okay, let me break this down. The key things are that it needs to be a binding decision and avoid the courts. I'm leaning towards B, adjudication, since that fits those criteria, but I want to double-check the definitions just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question mentions avoiding court, so I'm not sure if litigation is the right answer. I'll have to think through the differences between the dispute resolution methods more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question. I think the answer is B, adjudication, since it involves a binding decision by an expert third party, which is what the question is asking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
9 months ago
I'm just hoping Franky B's doesn't end up in a food fight with their supplier. That would be the worst way to resolve this dispute!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
9 months ago
Hmm, I don't know. Conciliation might be worth a shot - it could help the two parties come to an agreement without a third-party decision. But mediation or adjudication are probably safer bets.
upvoted 0 times
Vincent
8 months ago
I agree, but mediation might be more effective in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
8 months ago
I think conciliation could work, it might help both sides find common ground.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roosevelt
10 months ago
I believe adjudication might be quicker, but it's more formal and less flexible than mediation or conciliation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brigette
10 months ago
Conciliation could also work, it's similar to mediation but with more guidance from the third party.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
10 months ago
I agree with Bernadine, mediation is a more collaborative approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
10 months ago
Definitely not litigation! That would just make things worse and more expensive. Mediation or adjudication are the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Edna
8 months ago
Adjudication could also be a good choice for resolving the conflict.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
8 months ago
I think mediation would be the best option for Franky B's.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loise
9 months ago
I agree, litigation should be avoided at all costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bernadine
10 months ago
I think mediation would be the best option for Franky B's.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
10 months ago
Adjudication seems like the way to go. A third-party expert making a binding decision sounds exactly like what Franky B's needs to resolve this conflict.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
10 months ago
I think mediation would be the best option for Franky B's. It allows them to have a third-party expert make a binding decision without the hassle of going to court.
upvoted 0 times
Irma
9 months ago
I think conciliation could also be a good choice for resolving the conflict with the supplier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
9 months ago
Adjudication might be a good choice for Franky B's. It involves a third party making a binding decision based on evidence presented.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
10 months ago
Conciliation could also work for Franky B's. It involves a neutral third party helping the parties reach a settlement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
10 months ago
I agree, mediation seems like the most suitable option for Franky B's.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
10 months ago
I agree, mediation seems like a good option for Franky B's. It's less formal than litigation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel