CIPS Exam L5M2 Topic 2 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L5M2 exam

Question #: 40
Topic #: 2

Robot Ltd manufactures high end robots. A lot of value is tied up in the stock that it holds within its warehouse as each robot is worth several thousand pounds. The company has decided to enlist the services of a third party provider for disaster recovery, to help them shape a plan for if something were to happen to the stock, such as a flood. Is this the correct thing for Robot Ltd to do?

Ayes- a 3rd party can provide broader experience and expertise

Byes- a third party is a cheap option for disaster recovery planning

Cno- Robot Ltd should create a cross-functional team to draw up the plan as internal stakeholders will understand the risks better than a 3rd party

Dno - a 3rd party can only help in the solution stage of disaster recovery, not the planning stage

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

The correct answer is 1 - the 3rd party can provide broader experience and expertise. They can advise on best practice and will know how to advise Robot Ltd as they will have experience across a wide range of companies. This is explained on p.91 of the study guide

by Ronny at Aug 28, 2024, 06:35 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium L5M2 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Callie

1 months ago

This question is a piece of cake! I'd go with option A - it's a no-brainer. Though I'm still trying to figure out what a 'robot' is. Are those the things that make the coffee in the breakroom?

upvoted 0 times

Yuonne

18 days ago

A) yes- a 3rd party can provide broader experience and expertise

upvoted 0 times

...

Fannie

25 days ago

C) no- Robot Ltd should create a cross-functional team to draw up the plan as internal stakeholders will understand the risks better than a 3rd party

upvoted 0 times

...

Glendora

28 days ago

A) yes- a 3rd party can provide broader experience and expertise

upvoted 0 times

...

Christoper

2 months ago

Hmm, option D actually makes a lot of sense. A third-party can only help with the solution, not the all-important planning phase.

upvoted 0 times

Devora

1 months ago

That's a good point. Internal stakeholders would have a better understanding of the risks involved.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawnda

1 months ago

C) no- Robot Ltd should create a cross-functional team to draw up the plan as internal stakeholders will understand the risks better than a 3rd party

upvoted 0 times

...

Sylvie

1 months ago

A) yes- a 3rd party can provide broader experience and expertise

upvoted 0 times

...

Raymon

2 months ago

Nah, option C is the clear winner. No one knows the business better than the people who work there. A third-party just won't get it.

upvoted 0 times

Cammy

22 days ago

Exactly, they know the ins and outs better than anyone else.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brock

26 days ago

True, internal stakeholders have a deeper understanding of the business.

upvoted 0 times

...

Scot

1 months ago

C) no- Robot Ltd should create a cross-functional team to draw up the plan as internal stakeholders will understand the risks better than a 3rd party

upvoted 0 times

...

Hector

2 months ago

A) yes- a 3rd party can provide broader experience and expertise

upvoted 0 times

...

Eloisa

2 months ago

I think a third party can only help in the solution stage, not the planning stage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawnda

2 months ago

I disagree, Robot Ltd should create a cross-functional team for disaster recovery planning.

upvoted 0 times

...

Silva

2 months ago

I agree with Werner, a third party can provide broader experience and expertise.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eladia

2 months ago

Option B seems like the most cost-effective choice. Who needs all that fancy internal planning when you can outsource it for cheap?

upvoted 0 times

Yolando

2 months ago

I disagree. We should have our own team handle it, they know our business best.

upvoted 0 times

...

Daren

2 months ago

I think option B is the way to go. Cheaper and easier.

upvoted 0 times

...

Huey

2 months ago

I think option A is the way to go. A third-party provider can bring a fresh perspective and industry-leading expertise to the table.

upvoted 0 times

Tamie

1 months ago

Definitely, having broader experience can help ensure a more comprehensive disaster recovery plan.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

2 months ago

I agree, a third party can provide valuable insights that internal stakeholders may not have.

upvoted 0 times

...

Werner

3 months ago

I think Robot Ltd should enlist the services of a third party for disaster recovery.

upvoted 0 times

...