SFO procurement manager sent a request for quotation to Vogon International in which he determined the contract terms and specification. In SFO's standard terms and conditions, it is stated that 'Goods shall be delivered and Services performed by the applicable Delivery Date. Supplier must notify Buyer 3 days prior to the Delivery Date if Supplier is likely to be unable to meet a Delivery Date.'
Vogon replied with a quotation without any amendment to SFO's terms & conditions. The SFO procurement manager found the prices were reasonable and submitted to senior management. Senior management team accepted that quotation and sent a notification to Vogon. On the Delivery Date, Vogon said they had no capacity to supply the product as the quotation due to a workers' strike. Did Vogon breach any agreement with SFO?
SFO issued an RFQ with defined terms and condition and detailed specification. This RFQ can be considered as an invitation to treat. Vogon's quotation is an answer to the purchaser's RFQ and is an offer to SFO. The contract come to life at the time Vogon received the notification from SFO senior management.
The strike may be a force majeur event, depending on the contract particular clauses and jurisdiction. In common law countries, force majeur is applicable as an exclusion of liability only if the contract allows it. In many civil law countries, force majeur is an implied term. But in every jurisdiction, force majeur is only a reason for excluding liability for non-performance of a contract. In other words, the non-performance party is not liable for any breach if force majeur event occurs but the event does not exclude the breach.
LO 1, AC 1.2
Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!