BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIPS Exam L4M2 Topic 1 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIPS's L4M2 exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 1
[All L4M2 Questions]

A company has a lists of items that make up 15% of total spend. These items also do not largely impact on quality of final product. The supply continuity is secured. Which of the following will be the most appropriate managing approach to purchase these items?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Those items make up small portion of spend and the supply risk is low. So it is tactical item according to Kraljic portfolio matrix. Procurement should bundle these items into larger contracts, simplify procurement process.

LO 2, AC 2.1


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ryan
3 months ago
D) Drive down cost based on market competition. The classic 'race to the bottom' approach. Gotta love it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
3 months ago
A) Enhance supply continuity? More like enhance my nap time during this exam, am I right folks? *wink wink*
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm going with C) Build partnership with suppliers. It's the only way to secure that supply continuity and keep the quality up, you know? Plus, who doesn't love a good supplier-buyer bromance?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
3 months ago
I think D) Drive down cost based on market competition is the best option. Gotta squeeze those suppliers for all they're worth, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Ligia
2 months ago
True, but driving down costs based on market competition could lead to better deals for the company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
2 months ago
I see your point, but simplifying the procurement process could also save time and resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
2 months ago
But wouldn't enhancing supply continuity be more beneficial in the long run?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mike
2 months ago
Enhancing supply continuity could also be a good option to ensure a steady flow of these items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lacresha
2 months ago
I agree, building partnerships can lead to better quality and service. It's not always about driving down costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
2 months ago
I think C) Build partnership with suppliers is a better approach. It's important to have strong relationships with suppliers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
2 months ago
I disagree, I think C) Build partnership with suppliers is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Edwin
3 months ago
B) Simplify procurement process is the way to go. Who needs all that fancy partnership nonsense when you can just streamline the process and get it done faster?
upvoted 0 times
Sherita
2 months ago
B) Simplify procurement process
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
2 months ago
A) Enhance supply continuity
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carline
3 months ago
Driving down costs based on market competition might also be a good strategy to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Na
3 months ago
I believe building a partnership with suppliers could also be beneficial in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celia
3 months ago
I agree with Louvenia, ensuring a steady supply is crucial for these items.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
4 months ago
I think the most appropriate approach would be to enhance supply continuity.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel