BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CIMA Exam CIMAPRO19-P02-1 Topic 1 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRO19-P02-1 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 1
[All CIMAPRO19-P02-1 Questions]

Which of the following statements is TRUE about the activity based costing system when compared to absorption costing method?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Gail at Apr 13, 2024, 06:47 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRO19-P02-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Henriette
5 months ago
I see your point, I think B) ABC will be less detailed than an absorption costing system could also be a valid answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
5 months ago
But wouldn't ABC require more resources to track activities and costs, making it more expensive to administer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's D) ABC will cost less to administer than an absorption costing system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
6 months ago
I think the correct answer is C) ABC will provide more accurate overhead allocation than absorption costing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
6 months ago
I think the answer is A because ABC is actually more complex to administer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
6 months ago
I'm leaning towards B because ABC is usually more detailed than absorption costing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindy
6 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D because ABC is cheaper to administer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
6 months ago
I think the answer is C because ABC provides more accurate overhead allocation.
upvoted 0 times
Alisha
6 months ago
I agree. ABC will provide more accurate overhead allocation than absorption costing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
6 months ago
I think the answer is C. ABC provides more accurate overhead allocation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katy
7 months ago
Alright, alright, let's not get too carried away here. I think the key is that ABC will provide more accurate costing, even if it's a bit more of a hassle to implement. In the long run, the improved decision-making from better cost data makes it worth it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
7 months ago
Haha, yeah, I can just imagine the poor accountants trying to wrangle all the activity drivers and cost pools for ABC. Sounds like a nightmare compared to the good old days of just using direct labor hours!
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
7 months ago
That's a good point. ABC does require more data collection and analysis, which could make it more costly and time-consuming to set up and maintain. The simpler absorption costing might be preferable in some situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
7 months ago
But isn't ABC also more complex and resource-intensive to implement? I'm not so sure about the 'easier to administer' and 'cost less' claims in A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ayesha
7 months ago
I agree with Curt. ABC is designed to be more granular and precise in how it allocates overhead, which should lead to a more accurate cost assignment compared to the broader, volume-based approach of absorption costing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
7 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky question. I think the correct answer is C - ABC will provide more accurate overhead allocation than absorption costing. The whole point of activity-based costing is to more accurately assign overhead costs to products based on the specific activities and resources they consume.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel