Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIMA Exam CIMAPRA19-F03-1 Topic 5 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA19-F03-1 exam
Question #: 104
Topic #: 5
[All CIMAPRA19-F03-1 Questions]

F Co. is a large private company, the founder holds 60% of the company's share capital and her 2 children each hold 20% of the share capital.

The company requires a large amount of long-term finance to pursue expansion opportunities, the finance is required within the next 3 months. The family has agreed that an Initial Public Offering (IPO) should not be pursued at this time, because it would take up to 12 months to arrange.

The existing shareholders are currently considering raising the required finance from an established Venture Capitalist in the form of debt and equity. The Venture Capitalist has agreed to provide the required finance provided it can earn a return on investment of 25% per year. In addition, the Venture Capitalist requires 60% of the equity capital, a directorship in the company and a veto on all expenditure of a capital or revenue nature above a specified limit.

From the perspective of the family, which of the following are advantages of raising the required finance from the Venture Capitalist?

Select all that apply.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kristin
3 days ago
I can't imagine the family is thrilled about giving up 60% of the equity, but desperate times call for desperate measures. At least they're not going the IPO route, which would be even more painful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
4 days ago
As long as the Venture Capitalist knows what they're doing, I think the family should go for it. This could be a game-changer for the company's expansion plans.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karl
8 days ago
The speed of obtaining the finance is a major advantage, but the changes in shareholding and the veto power are concerning. The family needs to carefully weigh the pros and cons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
12 days ago
Getting a Venture Capitalist on board will definitely bring in valuable expertise, but I'm not sure I'm comfortable with them having a 60% stake and a veto power.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
17 days ago
The 25% return on investment required by the Venture Capitalist seems a bit steep. I hope the family can negotiate a better deal.
upvoted 0 times
Bernardo
3 days ago
I think the speed of obtaining the finance is a big advantage. Option D is the correct choice here
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daryl
26 days ago
But what about the changes in shareholding and the cost of finance? Those are important factors to consider as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
1 months ago
I agree with Kris, speed is crucial for the company's expansion plans.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
1 months ago
I think the advantage of raising finance from the Venture Capitalist is the speed with which the finance can be obtained.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel