CIMA Exam CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 Topic 4 Question 110 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIMA's CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 exam

Question #: 110
Topic #: 4

Tee Ltd has contracted to use Vee Ltd's "Grand Hotel" for a business conference. Which of the following would not be regarded as a valid excuse for Vee Ltd for the unavailability of the hotel on the agreed date?

(i) The hotel was closed due to flood damage.

(ii) The hotel was double booked.

(iii) The hotel manager had arranged to have the hotel redecorated; the decorators had failed to complete the work by the agreed date.

A(i) only

B(iii) only

C(ii) and (iii) only

D(i), (ii) and (iii)

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Vilma at Apr 04, 2025, 06:25 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CIMAPRA17-BA4-1 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Phuong

4 days ago

I think the valid excuse would be (i) only.

upvoted 0 times

...