Cyber Monday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CheckPoint Exam 156-836 Topic 3 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for CheckPoint's 156-836 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 3
[All 156-836 Questions]

What cannot be a reason for "Failed to get remote orchestrator interfaces" error message, when clicking on "Orchestrator" in WebUI

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

One of the possible reasons for the ''Failed to get remote orchestrator interfaces'' error message, when clicking on ''Orchestrator'' in WebUI, is that the remote orchestrator has no empty interfaces that can be assigned to a security group. This can happen if all the interfaces on the remote orchestrator are already part of configured security groups, or if the remote orchestrator has no physical interfaces at all. In this case, the WebUI cannot display the unassigned interfaces of the remote orchestrator, and shows the error message.

Reference

* Not able to see unassigned interfaces on checkpoint Orchestrator

* Maestro 140 not detecting Interfaces

* Maestro Expert (CCME) Course - Check Point Software, page


by Latrice at Sep 15, 2024, 09:24 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 156-836 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Caprice
2 months ago
I bet the person who wrote this question was just sitting at their desk, cackling maniacally, thinking 'Let's see who can figure out this riddle!'
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
2 months ago
This is easy! The correct answer is A. If the remote orchestrator has no empty interfaces, how can it be a reason for the error message? Duh!
upvoted 0 times
Arlette
1 months ago
D. Remote orchestrator has no empty interfaces
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
1 months ago
C. Remote orchestrator not running
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamie
1 months ago
B. Network connectivity issues
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
1 months ago
A. Incorrect credentials
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kattie
2 months ago
Is it just me, or does this question feel like a trick question? I'm going with B, just to mess with the graders.
upvoted 0 times
Amalia
27 days ago
A: Let's double check the documentation to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
1 months ago
B: Really? I thought it was option A. Now I'm not sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
1 months ago
A: I think it's actually option C, because I remember encountering that issue before.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cassie
2 months ago
Nah, I'm pretty sure it's D. No sync between orchestrators is the only one that makes sense as a reason for that error.
upvoted 0 times
Marleen
1 months ago
D: No sync between orchestrators seems like the most likely reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
1 months ago
C: I'm leaning towards C. Network connectivity issues with orchestrator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
2 months ago
B: Maybe it's B. Invalid credentials for orchestrator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
2 months ago
A: I think it could also be A. Incorrect orchestrator URL.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Johnetta
3 months ago
Hmm, I think the correct answer is C. Having only one orchestrator but with the Orchestrator amount set to 2 or no sync between orchestrators would definitely cause that error message.
upvoted 0 times
Eva
1 months ago
Absolutely, maintaining sync between orchestrators is crucial to prevent such errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
2 months ago
Make sure to check the configuration settings to avoid encountering that error message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viki
2 months ago
So, it's important to ensure proper synchronization between orchestrators to avoid this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheldon
2 months ago
Yes, not having synchronization between orchestrators can also lead to the 'Failed to get remote orchestrator interfaces' error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
2 months ago
Yes, that could definitely be a reason for the 'Failed to get remote orchestrator interfaces' error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
2 months ago
I agree, having only one orchestrator but with the Orchestrator amount set to 2 would cause that error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
2 months ago
I agree, having only one orchestrator but with the Orchestrator amount set to 2 would cause that error.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hana
3 months ago
That's a good point, it could also be option D, if there is no synchronization between orchestrators.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlee
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the issue might be option C, having 2 Orchestrator amount configured for only one orchestrator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hana
3 months ago
I think the reason could be option B, having 2 orchestrators in a single orchestrator environment.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel