CheckPoint Exam 156-836 Topic 3 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for CheckPoint's 156-836 exam

Question #: 24
Topic #: 3

What cannot be a reason for "Failed to get remote orchestrator interfaces" error message, when clicking on "Orchestrator" in WebUI

ARemote orchestrator has no empty interfaces

BSingle orchestrator environment, but configured Orchestrator amount is 2

COne orchestrator only, but Orchestrator amount is 2 or no Sync in between orchestrators

DNo Sync between orchestrators

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

One of the possible reasons for the ''Failed to get remote orchestrator interfaces'' error message, when clicking on ''Orchestrator'' in WebUI, is that the remote orchestrator has no empty interfaces that can be assigned to a security group. This can happen if all the interfaces on the remote orchestrator are already part of configured security groups, or if the remote orchestrator has no physical interfaces at all. In this case, the WebUI cannot display the unassigned interfaces of the remote orchestrator, and shows the error message.

Reference

* Not able to see unassigned interfaces on checkpoint Orchestrator

* Maestro 140 not detecting Interfaces

* Maestro Expert (CCME) Course - Check Point Software, page

by Latrice at Sep 15, 2024, 09:24 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 156-836 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Caprice

21 days ago

I bet the person who wrote this question was just sitting at their desk, cackling maniacally, thinking 'Let's see who can figure out this riddle!'

upvoted 0 times

...

Anika

25 days ago

This is easy! The correct answer is A. If the remote orchestrator has no empty interfaces, how can it be a reason for the error message? Duh!

upvoted 0 times

Arlette

1 days ago

D. Remote orchestrator has no empty interfaces

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladys

5 days ago

C. Remote orchestrator not running

upvoted 0 times

...

Jamie

7 days ago

B. Network connectivity issues

upvoted 0 times

...

Kattie

14 days ago

A. Incorrect credentials

upvoted 0 times

...

Kattie

29 days ago

Is it just me, or does this question feel like a trick question? I'm going with B, just to mess with the graders.

upvoted 0 times

Tegan

1 days ago

A: I think it's actually option C, because I remember encountering that issue before.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cassie

1 months ago

Nah, I'm pretty sure it's D. No sync between orchestrators is the only one that makes sense as a reason for that error.

upvoted 0 times

Candra

12 days ago

C: I'm leaning towards C. Network connectivity issues with orchestrator.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamie

21 days ago

B: Maybe it's B. Invalid credentials for orchestrator.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nickolas

27 days ago

A: I think it could also be A. Incorrect orchestrator URL.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnetta

2 months ago

Hmm, I think the correct answer is C. Having only one orchestrator but with the Orchestrator amount set to 2 or no sync between orchestrators would definitely cause that error message.

upvoted 0 times

Eva

13 days ago

Absolutely, maintaining sync between orchestrators is crucial to prevent such errors.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ciara

16 days ago

Make sure to check the configuration settings to avoid encountering that error message.

upvoted 0 times

...

Viki

19 days ago

So, it's important to ensure proper synchronization between orchestrators to avoid this issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sheldon

29 days ago

Yes, not having synchronization between orchestrators can also lead to the 'Failed to get remote orchestrator interfaces' error.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adolph

29 days ago

Yes, that could definitely be a reason for the 'Failed to get remote orchestrator interfaces' error.

upvoted 0 times

...

Matthew

1 months ago

I agree, having only one orchestrator but with the Orchestrator amount set to 2 would cause that error.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marylyn

1 months ago

I agree, having only one orchestrator but with the Orchestrator amount set to 2 would cause that error.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hana

2 months ago

That's a good point, it could also be option D, if there is no synchronization between orchestrators.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashlee

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe the issue might be option C, having 2 Orchestrator amount configured for only one orchestrator.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hana

2 months ago

I think the reason could be option B, having 2 orchestrators in a single orchestrator environment.

upvoted 0 times

...