BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CheckPoint Exam 156-836 Topic 3 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for CheckPoint's 156-836 exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 3
[All 156-836 Questions]

What cannot be a reason for "Failed to get remote orchestrator interfaces" error message, when clicking on "Orchestrator" in WebUI

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

One of the possible reasons for the ''Failed to get remote orchestrator interfaces'' error message, when clicking on ''Orchestrator'' in WebUI, is that the remote orchestrator has no empty interfaces that can be assigned to a security group. This can happen if all the interfaces on the remote orchestrator are already part of configured security groups, or if the remote orchestrator has no physical interfaces at all. In this case, the WebUI cannot display the unassigned interfaces of the remote orchestrator, and shows the error message.

Reference

* Not able to see unassigned interfaces on checkpoint Orchestrator

* Maestro 140 not detecting Interfaces

* Maestro Expert (CCME) Course - Check Point Software, page


Contribute your Thoughts:

Laine
1 months ago
I'm just here for the free coffee and donuts. The exam part is optional, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
1 months ago
Olivia
upvoted 0 times
Ulysses
3 days ago
Make sure the network connection is stable
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
29 days ago
Check if the orchestrator service is running
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Deeann
2 months ago
I think option C) is also a possible reason, if there is no synchronization between the orchestrators.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
2 months ago
This question is making my head spin! I'm just gonna guess and go with B. Why not, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
2 months ago
I'm with Wenona on this one. No sync between orchestrators has got to be the reason for this error.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
2 months ago
I believe option B) could be the reason for the error, having more configured orchestrators than actually available.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm gonna go with D - no sync between orchestrators. That would definitely lead to this error message.
upvoted 0 times
Ashton
13 days ago
A: Well, I guess we'll have to check and see what the actual cause is.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
15 days ago
C: I agree with B, it's most likely C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jody
18 days ago
B: I'm not sure about that. I would go with C - invalid credentials.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
1 months ago
A: I think it could be A - incorrect orchestrator URL.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jerlene
2 months ago
I think C is the correct answer. Having only one orchestrator, but a configured Orchestrator amount of 2, would definitely cause this error.
upvoted 0 times
Audra
1 months ago
Yeah, that lack of sync between orchestrators can definitely lead to issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
1 months ago
I agree, having a configured Orchestrator amount of 2 with only one orchestrator would cause the error.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cecil
2 months ago
I agree with Alpha, option A) seems like a valid configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
2 months ago
Option A seems like the most logical answer. If the remote orchestrator has no empty interfaces, it shouldn't be causing a 'Failed to get remote orchestrator interfaces' error.
upvoted 0 times
Tabetha
1 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. If there are empty interfaces, it could cause the error message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
1 months ago
I think option A is correct, the remote orchestrator should have no empty interfaces.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alpha
2 months ago
I think option A) is not a valid reason for the error.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel