Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CheckPoint Exam 156-586 Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for CheckPoint's 156-586 exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 1
[All 156-586 Questions]

After kernel debug with "fw ctl debug" you received a huge amount of information. It was saved in a very large file that is difficult to open and analyze with standard text editors. Suggest a solution to solve this issue.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Vincenza at Apr 11, 2024, 02:37 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 156-586 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Yoko
9 months ago
Reducing the debug buffer to 1024KB and running debug several times seems like a practical solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
9 months ago
Check Point InfoView utility could also be helpful in analyzing the debug output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
9 months ago
I think using 'fw ctl zdebug' with 1024KB buffer size might be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
9 months ago
Have you tried dividing the debug information into smaller files using 'fw ctl kdebug'?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
9 months ago
I am struggling with the huge amount of debug information after kernel debug.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
10 months ago
That's a valid point, It could be a good approach to tackle the issue in a different way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tish
10 months ago
I prefer option D, reducing the debug buffer to 1024KB and running debug multiple times seems like a more efficient solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
10 months ago
I agree with splitting the information into smaller files will definitely help in managing such a large amount of data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
10 months ago
I think option A is a good idea, dividing the debug information into smaller files will make it easier to analyze.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
11 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writers are just trying to trip us up with this one. They're probably sitting back and laughing at all the confused candidates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanjuana
11 months ago
Option D seems a bit risky to me. Reducing the debug buffer size might cause us to miss some important information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not familiar with the Check Point InfoView utility. Does anyone have experience using that?
upvoted 0 times
Nickolas
9 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Horace
10 months ago
User 3
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxanne
10 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
10 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Burma
11 months ago
Option B with the 'fw ctl zdebug' command could work too, but I'm not sure if that would give us the same level of detail as the 'fw ctl debug' output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
11 months ago
Yeah, I agree. I think option A is probably the best solution here. Dividing the debug info into smaller files makes a lot of sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
11 months ago
Wow, this question is tricky! I've definitely had to deal with those huge debug files before. It's such a pain to open them with normal text editors.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel