Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CFA Institute Exam CFA-Level-II Topic 2 Question 74 Discussion

Actual exam question for CFA Institute's CFA Level II Chartered Financial Analyst exam
Question #: 74
Topic #: 2
[All CFA Level II Chartered Financial Analyst Questions]

Lauren Jacobs, CFA, is an equity analyst for DF Investments. She is evaluating Iron Parts Inc. Iron Parts is a manufacturer of interior systems and components for automobiles. The company is the world's second largest original equipment auto parts supplier, with a market capitalization of $1.8 billion. Based on Iron Parts's low price-to-book value ratio of 0.9* and low price-to-sales ratio of 0.15x, Jacobs believes the stock could be an interesting investment. However, she wants to review the disclosures found in the company's financial footnotes. In particular, Jacobs is concerned about Iron Parts's defined benefit pension plan. The following information for 2007 and 2008 is provided.

Iron Parts has adopted SFAS No. 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pensions and Other Postretirement Plans.

Jacobs wants to fully understand the impact of changing pension assumptions on Iron Parts's balance sheet and income statement. In addition, she would like to compute Iron Parts's economic pension expense.

As of December 31, 2008, the funded status of Iron Parts's pension plan was:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Funded status equals fair value of plan assets minus PBO (395 - 635 = -240). (Study Session 6, LOS 22.c,f)


Contribute your Thoughts:

Huey
4 months ago
I calculated the economic pension expense for Iron Parts and it seems like a risky investment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
4 months ago
I think it might actually be $240 million underfunded based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
4 months ago
I believe the funded status of Iron Parts's pension plan was $175 million underfunded.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
4 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It's important to fully understand the impact of changing pension assumptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
4 months ago
I think the question about Iron Parts Inc.'s pension plan is quite tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amina
4 months ago
I agree with Emeline and B. The underfunded amount is likely $240 million based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbie
5 months ago
I disagree, I think the answer is A) $175 million underfunded. The numbers are quite concerning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
6 months ago
I also believe it is B) $240 million underfunded. The pension plan seems to be in a bad shape.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emeline
6 months ago
I think the answer is B) $240 million underfunded.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel