BlackFriday 2024! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CFA Institute Exam CFA-Level-II Topic 2 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for CFA Institute's CFA-Level-II exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 2
[All CFA-Level-II Questions]

William Bow, CFA, is a risk manager for GlobeCorp, an international conglomerate with operations in the technology, consumer products, and medical devices industries. Exactly one year ago, GlobeCorp, under Bow's advice, entered into a 3-year payer interest rate swap with semiannual floating rate payments based on the London interbank offered rate (LIBOR) and semiannual fixed rate payments based on an annual rate of 2.75%. At the time of initiation, the swap had a value of zero and the notional principal was set equal to $150 million. The counterparty to GlobeCorp's swap is NVS Bank, a commercial bank that also serves as a swap dealer. Exhibit 1 below summarizes the current LIBOR term structure.

Upper management at GlobeCorp feels that the original swap has served its intended purpose but that circumstances have changed and it is now time to offset the firm's exposure to the swap. Because they cannot find a counterparty to an offsetting swap transaction, management has asked Bow to come up with alternative measures to offset the swap exposure. Bow created a report for the management team which outlines several strategies to neutralize the swap exposure. Two of his strategies are included in Exhibit 2.

After examining its long-term liabilities, NVS Bank has decided that it currently needs to borrow $100 million over the next two years to finance its operations. For this type of funding need, NVS generally issues quarterly coupon short-term floating rate notes based on 90-day LIBOR. NVS is concerned, however, that interest rates may shift upward and the LIBOR curve may become upward sloping. To manage this risk, NVS is considering utilizing interest rate derivatives. Managers at the bank have collected quotes on over-the-counter interest rate caps and floors from a well known securities dealer. The quotes, which are based on a notional principal of $100 million, are provided in Exhibit 3.

One of the managers at NVS Bank, Lois Green, has expressed her distrust of the securities dealer quoting prices on the caps and floors. In a memo to the CFO, Green suggested that NVS use an alternative but equivalent approach to manage the interest rate risk associated with its two-year funding plan. Following is an excerpt from Green's memo:

"Rather than using a cap or floor, NVS Bank can effectively manage its exposure to interest rates resulting from the 2-year funding requirement by taking long positions in a series of put options on fixed-income instruments with expiration dates that coincide with the payment dates on the floating rate note."

"As a cheaper alternative, NVS can effectively manage its exposure to interest rates resulting from the 2-ycar funding requirement by creating a collar using long positions in a series of call options on interest rates and long positions in a series of call options on fixed income instruments all of which would have expiration dates that coincide with the payment dates on the floating rate note."

GlobeCorp is concerned with its exposure to the interest rate swap initiated one year ago. Evaluate the strategies recommended by Bow in Exhibit 2.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

A payer swap such as GlobeCorps is obligated to pay multiple fixed rate payments to, and receive multiple floating rate payments from, the counterparty. The payer swap therefore gains (loses) value if interest rates rise (fall) since floating rate payments will be greater (less) than the required fixed rate payments. Similarly, the long position in a forward rate agreement (FRA) allows the purchaser to borrow at a specified rate (pay fixed). If interest rates rise (fall), the long FRA position gains (loses) value. Thus, we can state that a series of long off-market FRAs is equivalent to a pay fixed interest rate swap. To ofTset an existing pay fixed swap position, a position with opposite exposure to interest rates must be established. Therefore, Strategy 1 is appropriate since it involves a short position in a series of off-market FRA contracts with settlement dates and underlying interest rates that correspond to the swap payment dates (the FRAs are all based on 180-day or 6-month LIBOR and settle in 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months). Strategy 2 will not offset GlobeCorps existing interest rate swap position. A pay fixed interest rate swap position is equivalent to being short a fixed rate bond and long a floating rate bond. In order to neutralize such a position, the opposite transactions need to be established. Strategy 2 correctly states that GlobeCorp should take a short position in a floating rate note but this will only offset half of the swap position. GlobeCorp must also purchase a fixed rate bond with a coupon rate equal to the fixed rate on the swap. (Study Session 17, LOS 6 Lb)


Contribute your Thoughts:

Currently there are no comments in this discussion, be the first to comment!


Save Cancel